I was a juror in a criminal trial and we almost let a flasher/pedophile go because there wasn't a YouTube video of the entire incident.
Not really, because of "from the account" we put the POS in prison for the max of six years. We found out later that he had prior convictions and additional pending charges.
I sure am glad we didn't "require" a video to do our duty and jail this menace.
Did you base your decision on somebody’s blog post or the evidence at trial?
In no way has anything “from the account” been verified or even formally investigated—at least as can be gathered from this post.