George Washington -- The Culturist Father of Our Country (First President was no Multi-Culturalist)

American Thinker ^ | 07/04/2010 | John Kenneth Press

[SeekAndFind]

Writers of public school curricula would do well to note that George Washington, the Father of our country, was no multiculturalist. Call him a culturist. Washington laid out his culturist principles in a document all schoolchildren used to study, his 1796 Farewell Address to the nation, upon completing his second term as president.

Far from celebrating our multicultural ties to the Old World, Washington argued that

... it is of infinite moment that you should properly estimate the immense value of your national union to your collective and individual happiness; ... indignantly frowning upon the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest, or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts.

He told his audience that "[c]itizens, by birth or choice, of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections." And in this context, Washington took solace in the fact that "[w]ith slight shades of difference, you have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles because this similarity created strong cultural ties within our national community."

Washington further showed himself a culturist when he meditated for some time on the importance of public morality to the success of our "experiment" in self-government. Highlighting religion, he wrote, 

Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity.

He declared culturist considerations a duty when he told the nation, 

It is substantially true that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government. The rule, indeed, extends with more or less force to every species of free government. Who that is a sincere friend to it can look with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric?

Washington's Farewell Address echoed another core culturist precept in his discussion of isolationism. Among his many statements against foreign entanglements, he asked us not to "entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice."

He probably emphasized avoiding entanglements with Europe, as it was the only region with which we would seriously consider meddling. To the extent that we must have alliances, culturism suggests we should bolster Western nations. But on the whole, culturism advocates against foreign entanglements. Furthermore, Washington urged us to "take vigorous exertion in time of peace to discharge the debts which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burden which we ourselves ought to bear."

Thus, in his turgid farewell to the nation, Washington expressed the tenets of culturism perfectly. Rather than urging a multicultural philosophy that emphasizes our differences, he feared diversity undermining our unity and emphasized our commonality. Rather than calling indifference to public morality a virtue, he argued that the survival of our republic depends on our cultivating a sense of duty. Not a globalist, he cautioned against wars. And as he did, he suggested that we put the concerns of our Western brethren first and then pay off the accumulated debt immediately. Like all the Founding Fathers, George Washington prioritized America's solvency in his thoughts. And along with all else he did, his Farewell Address solidifies his position as a great American culturist.

John Kenneth Press earned his doctorate in the History of Education from New York University. He is the author of "Culturism: A Word, A Value, Our Future." Culturism.us has more information on culturism.

[Huck]

Washington was a centralizer. He wanted to see the 13 independent colonies meld into one great Empire. Viewed through this prism, all the thoughts mentioned above come into focus.

[Howie66]

There should be tolerance for only one culture, here.

The American culture.

If you can’t handle that, the go back to whatever third rate crap hole that you came from.

[chuck_the_tv_out]

Multi-culturalism has been used for over 3000 years by invading armies to weaken and control their prey.

The Babylonians would use this exact methodology. Apon invading a new city-state, they would bring in various other conquered peoples and force them to live side-by-side. Soon they were fighting each other more than they were fighting the Babylonians, and after a time new cultures emerged, eliminating the old, which would be less against Babylon.

Multi-culturalism is a weapon. Always has been.

Strength is in unity. Always has been.

[PGalt]

Take vigorous exertion in time of peace to discharge the debts which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burden which we ourselves ought to bear. - George Washington 1732-1799

It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder. - Frederic Bastiat 1801-1850

[AuntB]

“Multi-culturalism is a weapon. Always has been.

Strength is in unity. Always has been.”

Amen!

[FrankR]

Projecting today's culture into yesteryear, in order to try and justify today's culture, is absurd.

It was a very, very different time, a different culture.

The learned study other cultures today - like islam - and reach out to try to understand and accept their weird ways; then they look back at our own history and try to condemn people of those times because they thought differently than we do today...go figure.

[Eva]

You’re right, it was a very different time because the population of the country was so small. It was impossible for different cultures to shut themselves off from the rest of the people. Oh, yeah, we had our “Germantowns” and Dutch enclaves, but Muslims and other smaller minorities had to get along. They wouldn’t have been in America if they didn’t want to get along.

Europe, itself, was very multi-cultural, at least among the educated classes because education was based on books written mostly by Romans and Greeks. Much of the university education in Europe was conducted in Latin so that students from all over the world could read and understand the same books.