Replies

Thus is a question of due process of the highest order. Obama was certified as qualified and the forms actually altered from what is traditional, a unilateral change on qualification of a candidate, imposed fraudulently by the Dem party in many states.

And you think it strictly political. Because of people who think like you we will have a remedy that is political.And when that happens you will indeed wish we had accomplished a legal remedy.You won't much like the political one, IMHO. Now the so called president is refusing to secure our borders as required by the constitution. Obviously his attitude is , "in for a penny, in for a pound!"

So we see a clear continuation if the approach taken to get him qualified.Interesting, huh?

Wonder what his next anti-constitution venture wil be, he seems to have several cooking as we post here.

Obama was certified as qualified and the forms actually altered from what is traditional, a unilateral change on qualification of a candidate, imposed fraudulently by the Dem party in many states.

There was no change in the DNC presidential certification forms used in 2008 for Obama. The 2000-Gore and 2004-Kerry certification forms are exactly the same as the 2008-Obama form, right down to the misspelled word.

The 2008 DNC certification form submitted to Hawaii included an affirmation that Obama and Biden met the Constitutional qualifications for the office of POTUS because Hawaii election law required that affirmation to be in the document submitted to them declaring the Party's presidential and vice presidential nominees.

And I never said this issue is or should be strictly a political question. In fact, if you read my post #23, you'd know that I believe the Courts should provide a "forum of last resort" for The People to be heard and obtain a remedy when their elected officials fail or refuse to act on a political question that isn't in their best interest.