[Seizethecarp]

“Plaintiffs’ claims fall squarely into the category of generalized grievances that are most appropriately handled by the legislative branch. The Court acknowledges Plaintiffs’ frustration with what they perceive as Congress’ inaction in this area, but their remedy may be found through their vote.
Id. at 483 n.5. We agree.”

WOW!

I read this to mean:

The Court (the District Court) acknowledges Plaintiffs’ frustration with what they perceive as Congress’ inaction in this area (clarifying Obama’s constitutional NBC status). We (3rd Circuit Appeals court) agree.

In other words, the 3rd Circuit Appeals Court agrees with the District Court's frustration with Congress’ inaction in failing to clarify Obama’s constitutional NBC status.

[little jeremiah]

Thank you for a ray of light in the darkness. There were a couple of others I admit; mostly 0thugga sycophants though.

[thecodont]

In other words, the 3rd Circuit Appeals Court agrees with the District Court's frustration with Congress’ inaction in failing to clarify Obama’s constitutional NBC status.

Well,

May the remedy come through Congress, then!

[Red Steel]

There you go. The courts in a roundabout way is telling you they don’t have the balls to judge whether if Obama is a natural born citizen. Hey they say, we are not going to stick our necks out if Congress won’t. They are setting aside their judicial review of Congress in this case. The word that describes the courts here is cowardice.

[Seizethecarp]

“In other words, the 3rd Circuit Appeals Court agrees with the District Court's frustration with Congress’ inaction in failing to clarify Obama’s constitutional NBC status.”

I believe that the 3rd Circuit was choking in frustration over having to cite again their own ruling on Berg's appeal:

“This court affirmed the order dismissing the suit, agreeing that ‘a candidate’s ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters.’”

Yup, having a constitutionally ineligible president sure isn't “an injury in fact to voters.” /s

I think my brain just exploded! (again)

[BuckeyeTexan]

In other words, the 3rd Circuit Appeals Court agrees with the District Court's frustration with Congress’ inaction in failing to clarify Obama’s constitutional NBC status.

That's incorrect. The District Court did not express frustration with Congress. The District Court acknowledged the Plaintiff's frustration with Congress.

The Court acknowledges Plaintiffs’ frustration with what they perceive as Congress’ inaction in this area, but their remedy may be found through their vote.

The 3rd Circuit is not agreeing with the District Court's frustration. (It did not express such.) The 3rd Circuit is agreeing with the District Court's ruling that the

"Plaintiff's claims fall squarely into the category of generalized grievances that are most appropriately handled by the legislative branch."