1 posted on
06/29/2010 11:25:34 AM PDT by
neverdem
To: JohnRLott
Whether the new Chicago and D.C. fees "infringe" on an individual's right to own a gun for self-protection must still be reviewed by the Supreme Court.Thanks for the info & essay!
2 posted on
06/29/2010 11:28:48 AM PDT by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
4 posted on
06/29/2010 12:14:01 PM PDT by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
To: neverdem
"D.C. went so far as to still ban all semiautomatic handguns that can hold a clip." I don't know of any semi-automatic handguns that holds a "clip."
5 posted on
06/29/2010 12:40:07 PM PDT by
Cobra64
To: neverdem
Paul Helmke... The 21st Century version of Nathan Bedford Forrest. Keep spewing your anti-civil rights garbage Paul... Don’t forget your burning cross and bed sheet.
11 posted on
06/29/2010 5:57:34 PM PDT by
BCR #226
(07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
To: neverdem
...Chicago's Mayor Richard Daley called it ... very frightening ... governments have... compelling interest in reducing crime related to firearms." If Daley wants to reduce crime he should devise a system that encourages FEWER criminals.
13 posted on
06/30/2010 7:05:33 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(More people are killed every year by falling vending machines than by holders of concealed-weapons)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
