Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blogger

So this means a Christian can join a gay rights group and speak against the gay lifestyle as a sin or the gay rights group will lose its funding. </s>


5 posted on 06/28/2010 8:27:31 AM PDT by MacombBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: MacombBob

As I interpret it ... yes it does.


12 posted on 06/28/2010 8:30:28 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MacombBob
Correct. From NRO's Bench Memo's:

Despite what you might read in the mainstream media, the court did not rule that the “classic” nondiscrimination policy (which is in force in hundreds of universities) trumped the student group’s right to freedom of association. That issue was left unresolved. Instead, the Court ruled that the all-comers policy (which is in force virtually nowhere) was constitutional — but only if it had been applied equally to all groups on campus.

So CLS has not yet lost its case. Despite an unfavorable ruling on the all-comers policy, it can still prevail on remand if it proves that the university did not apply the policy to all student groups but instead specifically targeted CLS. We have powerful evidence that the university has, in fact, targeted CLS.

66 posted on 06/28/2010 10:15:58 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MacombBob

I believe that you just described a hate crime/s


81 posted on 06/28/2010 12:14:16 PM PDT by Grunthor (Fat people are harder to kidnap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson