Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pox

“I have no doubt the Arizona rancher will lose this lawsuit and likely his ranch as well as this has already happened once in the recent past.”

Absolutely correct (#2 REALLY pisses me off).

1. http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=89295
2. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/19/national/19ranch.html


10 posted on 06/28/2010 8:40:23 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: ScottinVA; Pox
As your link shows, the judgement against Nethercott had nothing to do with violating the civil rights of the illegals. The judgement was about damages.

Additionally, Barnett has been sued previously for violation of the civil rights of illegals and he won the case.

He is not likely to lose this case either.

The plantiff(MALDEF) in this newest civil rights case is using faulty judgement. They are saying that since Barnett did lose another civil rights case brought some Americans of Mexican descent, then he will lose on violating the illegals' rights

21 posted on 06/28/2010 9:30:57 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson