Posted on 06/28/2010 4:40:32 AM PDT by Sioux-san
There is a relentless war being waged against American men that literally spans the entire extent of their lives. From the womb, in which a woman's "right" to abort a male baby for being male is defended but a similar right to abort a female baby for being female is vehemently opposed, to the grave, wherein the disparate impact of old age is ignored despite women living 5.2 years longer than men on the average, men are systematically, structurally and unstintingly under assault.
Most men understand this on some level, but like the nice dependable man who can't figure out why attractive women repeatedly reject him in favor of unemployed losers with criminal records, they are incapable of doing anything about it because they simply can't believe that women truly do not think or behave like men. Because they want to believe that women are "the civilizing force," their "better halves" or "the fair sex," they are constitutionally incapable of seeing what is, from a rational male perspective, the seething cauldron of amoral solipsism behind the collective pretty face.
The great theoreticians of Game, the social concept which has evolved from effective pick-up artistry to an incipient social science based on the sound principles of intelligent observation and the practical application of the scientific method, have conclusively demolished the outmoded Victorian view of women as more moral, more honorable or more high-minded than men. Indeed, they have demonstrated quite the opposite in illustrating how the male concepts of logic, honor, justice and self-sacrifice are almost entirely alien to thefemale mind.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
There is but one way to fight a war, and that way is found in the Bible. Where are the million men willing to fight to win? Where is the one they will follow? Will I as a Christian follow a non Christian? Will a non Christian fight with me to end abortion and homosexuality, unjust courts and corrupt politicians?
The US Constitution was supposed to protect everyone form tyranny. It does not. The reason why is the Supreme Disappointment.
I hope the author has a set of asbestos suits because he will surely be flamed by the girly men and feminists of the liberal media world.
like the nice dependable man who can't figure out why attractive women repeatedly reject him in favor of unemployed losers with criminal records....
I could never figure out that one. Seen many cases of it.
I think it goes deeper than that. Mothers, indoctrinated into a world that paints women as victims, approach their sons with an attitude in keeping with that they aim at all the rest of us evil men. I’ve seen it in my own family and it really louses things up for the kid.
As a young man, the prettier and hotter the girl, the worse I had to treat her. If I showed any respect, I was done by her. It is a sick world.
I don't get the marriage proposals for serial killers either, or the marrying your rapist situations. This world is simply LOADED with good, decent, honorable men, why so many women insist on hooking up with the jerks who use and abuse them ... I'm sure someone will tell me it's the money and/or the looks in those cases, I still don't get it.
It's an animal thing and such men might try looking at church for dates.
Also, the whole thing about the playground - in my grade school we were sort of unique in that we had two playgrounds, one for the girls and one for the boys. They were on opposite sides of the church property and were connected only by a walkway between the church and the school. At recess, once the girls went to their own, it is said that play on the boys' side changed and it was rougher. I think they still do that. Not a bad idea, actually.
I could never figure out that one. Seen many cases of it.
And nice, dependable women who are steady don't get why men think such chicks are attractive. Believe it or not, we're attracted to the bad boys, too, the difference is, we know darn well and good they're not going to look at us twice.
I can. One gets what one deserves. Those attractive women probably didn’t deserve him. We men are so stupid that we think that “attractive” automatically means “good”.
Attraction seems to operate on a chemical level, via pheromones. There is no rationality behind it. Some women learn to go against the biological instinct. Sometimes, the only symptom in the man is a bad temper or a high degree of sloth. Women will put up with that if there is loyalty and some degree of honor to counterbalance it.
On the other hand, men will chase the hot girl who never cooks, never cleans, won’t help financially, doesn’t want children, is unfaithful and rails on him constantly. Again, it is biology.
Late life marriages that occur after the woman’s menopause, are often more rational. I don’t think many women even understand their responses and many seem incapable of reasoning themselves out of them. Men will often remarry the shrew who just happens to look like their fantasy and who promises sex when what she is after is the security of his accumulated assets.
I was there back in the day. Society sided with the man. So, perhaps it is payback, although it is important that now society sides with the woman, so another payback may be in the offing. Neither situation is desirable, but biology trumps politics, IMO.
I think it is more difficult for the young, of both genders.
Interesting article. Thanks for posting.
Nope, never. Boooooo-ring.
As Anoreth says about most of her crewmates, "They're not interested in current events. They're not interested in 'Babylon 5.' They're not interested in theology, Shakespeare, Spanish history, Scandinavian sagas, computer programming, or entomology. Wake me up when they all leave."
so true.
I agree with some of this article, but disagree with the health part. Mother nature provides the species with 105 male babies for every 100 female babies. Intervention by the Chinese repressive rules and Indian mysogynist culture allows for the birth of about 117 males for every 100 female babies.
Likewise, once the dangers of childbirth were overcome by medical advances, the females became equal to males in longevity and eventually surpassed them.
Personally I think this male/female thing is so overdone, it irritates me. The feminist movement has become mostly a bunch of female whiners. It’s really a shame that the libs took over the movement and so thoroughy discredited it with their anti-male nonsense. But, it seems to be the case with many movements. Take the Civil rights movement which began with legitimate grievances about inequality of service, education, and human rights; it evolved into nthing more than a bunch of whiners and anti-white haters. Prime example - Rev. Jeremiah Wright!
That’s what happened to the feminist movement too. Most of these causes end up being just one more liberal complaint group.
Many years ago, a friend told me to treat a tramp the way I would a lady and treat a lady the way I would a tramp. I could never do that.
Nope, never. Boooooo-ring.
Well, babe, that's you. Some of the rest of us are. I do like a man who likes adventure. It's when you try to have a conversation on something other than the Cards' pitching rotation that problems seem to come up.
I’m curious as to what sort of “adventure” requires being a “bad boy,” instead of a good man with an interesting job or hobby?
Just philosophizing ... answer not required, of course.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.