Posted on 06/21/2010 2:31:45 PM PDT by jazusamo
Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) on Monday accused the Supreme Court of a constitutional power grab.
In a nearly hour-long floor speech, Specter said the court had ignored congressional will and ceded federal power to the presidency.
The outgoing senator, defeated in a Democratic primary last month, criticized Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito by name, saying both had paid “lip service” to Congress during their confirmation hearings.
Specter also urged his committee colleagues to take an especially sharp look at Solicitor General Elena Kagan, whose confirmation hearings for the Court begin next Monday. Otherwise, he said Congress risks seeing its power “being diluted.”
“You have justices in confirmation hearings committing to respecting and being deferential to congressional findings, but when the decision comes, 100 years of precedents are overturned. You don't have a modest decision. You have a decision which jolts the system.”
Specter referenced “a series of cases” where power had been shifted principally to the court, and secondarily to the executive branch.
“The Supreme Court of the United States is materially changing the traditional separation of powers, and as a result, the Congress of the United States continues to lose very substantial power in the federal scheme,” Specter said.
He said he had repeatedly raised the issue over the past 20 years, and that the “only opportunity we have to influence the process is through the confirmation of Supreme Court justices.”
Specter said justices have “substituted” their judgment for Congress’s by ignoring congressional determinations that condemned violence against women and rights for the disabled. Roberts and Alito – both appointees of former President George W. Bush – had used “all the right language” during their confirmation hearings but then ignored Congress once they were seated.
Specter also pointed to the recent “Citizens United” case, criticizing the Court for striking down parts of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law by eliminating certain restrictions on campaign spending by corporations and unions. The court found those restrictions violated the First Amendment.
“Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito used all the right language, but when we found the application of the language, they have done a reverse course,” Specter said.
“I do not challenge the good faith of Chief Justice Roberts or Justice Alito... But when we take a look at what happened in Citizens United... We have the enormous record which was created by the Congress in enacting McCain-Feingold, and the findings of fact there to support what the Congress did, which was invalidated by the Supreme Court of the United States, which upset 100 years of precedent in allowing corporations to engage in political advertising.”
Specter headed the Judiciary Committee from 2005 to 2007, and remains an influential figure on Supreme Court issues.
He has long advocated for the introduction of video cameras into the chambers, and spoke out on numerous judicial issues during Bush’s presidency. He was a visible critic of Bush's domestic surveillance program, and nearly lost his chairmanship after an attack by conservative leaders who said he was not deferential enough to Bush's nominees.
“The outgoing senator”.
Sounds like music from heaven.
Old pols never just fade away.
But in the end he will vote to approve her. Idiot.
Right problem, wrong suspects.
Why didn’t Spectacle speak out when the Supremes grabbed power by letting Private Co. grab homeowners land via Eminent Domain rulings? He’s a gasbag in desperate need of retirement. At least the voters of Pa. did something of worthwhile value for a change and sent Snarlen a packin’.
Couldn’t agree more. Specter was and is only for himself, PA voters finally saw through him and he deserved to be booted for a long time.
Specter is pushing hooey, because the congress determines the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. If they don’t want federal judges messing with something, they craft a quick bill that puts it out of their jurisdiction.
And that is something they don’t want to do, which is why we have a judicial system structurally rooted in the 19th Century. Congress could care less, preferring the to blame federal judges as an excuse for their own mischief.
You mean somebody still listens to anything The Sphincter says?
Gee Arlen ... “said one thing in the confirmation hearings and voted the other way” ... sort of like running as a Republican and then shifting to RAT, eh? You sound like a woman scorned. How is that betrayal workin’ out for ya?
Arlen who?
The whole system is one big friggin’ joke and not a funny one at that.
The Republicans are well rid of him and the Democrats have shown that they don't want him. Where is his influence going to show up?
Well, Congress and the Presidency have been usurping the power and authority of the states and of the people for years. To say that the USSC is doing anything other than their appropriate job is assinine. After all, this is supposed to be a government ‘of the people, by the people, and for the peoplem...’ And mr. specter swore to uphold the Constitution. His proclaiming that the USSC has done anything wrong is duplicitous at best, and treasonous at worst. All the USSC has done on the subject issue is to retrn a smidgen of power to where it belongs. Congress does have the power to make laws - but not laws that conflict with the Constitution.
Perhaps if 3/4 of the states would endorse the following, Congress might be cut down to size: “With this Amendment, the previously approved Constitutional Amendment No. 17 is hereby repealed, and U.S. Senators shall be selected as provided for in the original language of the Constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.