Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lancey Howard
That’s one odd post there, Bunky.

How so?

The cited blog didn't have a convincing case that Gen. Amos is pro-homoecstatic, to coin a word. She was just repeating a rumor or speculation. So I looked at Mabus's c.v. for any indications of a rainbowy political background, since it was supposedly Mabus who put Amos up for CMC in the first place. Evidence not found. Yet.

Ganz klar jetzt?

18 posted on 06/17/2010 8:15:23 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus
since it was supposedly Mabus who put Amos up for CMC in the first place.

Sheesh.. I missed that. Can you direct me to a source so I can read more?
Thanks.

19 posted on 06/17/2010 8:23:47 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: lentulusgracchus

Nevermind.. (Google is my friend.)
Thanks for the heads-up.

It is speculated that Amos was selected by Mabus and approved by Gates because they see him as not “pushing back” on defense spending cuts. I don’t like the sound of that, but I suppose it’s better than destroying the military from within by pushing social engineering in the form of sanctioned perversion down the military’s throat. (Can you imagine how tied up JAG and CIC would be with “hate crime” prosecutions? Good freaking grief...)

FRegards,
LH


21 posted on 06/17/2010 8:32:30 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: lentulusgracchus

P.S. Yes, it is very clear to me now.


22 posted on 06/17/2010 8:35:20 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson