Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Piling On With Palin: Tea Party Express Backs Murkowski Rival
Congressional Quarterly ^ | June 16, 2010

Posted on 06/16/2010 8:33:50 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: Bob J
Thank you for confirming my original statement that Palin endorsed Lisa Murkowski in the 2004 election.

Why don't you confirm it, Bob? Please provide a link showing where Palin endorsed Lisa Murkowksi in 2004. I was assuming you had such proof, but, then again, assuming you are doing more than just pulling stuff out of your arse is usually a mistake.

21 posted on 06/16/2010 9:25:53 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Having done a little research on LM it is obvious she is pro-abort. While taking a few conservative stands on related issues such as partial birth abortion, she votd no on barring grants to pro abort organizations and yes on stem cell reserach. Her lifetime NRTL rating is 50%.

If Palin had the strength of her right to life convictions, she would have recliined on her endorswement of pro-abort Murkowski, but she didn’t.

Plain stands for Palin, always has, always will. She’s a politician like all the rest and will always bend her positions and values if it benefits her.

22 posted on 06/16/2010 9:31:48 AM PDT by Bob J (Support "4" Palin is more religious crusade than political movement. Nothing evil but buyer beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Show us the proof that Palin endorsed Lisa Murkowski in 2004, Bob. A link would suffice.


23 posted on 06/16/2010 9:33:04 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You made the statement that Palin endorsed her rival in the primary and then LM in the general. You then spent the last several posts defending that move based on not allowing the dem to win.

If I need to check every statement you make for accuracy, please tell me. Up until now I have been taking most of your comments at face value.


24 posted on 06/16/2010 9:34:49 AM PDT by Bob J (Support "4" Palin is more religious crusade than political movement. Nothing evil but buyer beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Gawd, you are truly pathetic. YOU made this claim first:

That's funny, why then did Palin endorse and campaign for her in a previous election?

BACK IT UP.

25 posted on 06/16/2010 9:36:07 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

I guess they aren't BFF anymore.

26 posted on 06/16/2010 9:36:31 AM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Post 10, Bob. Your own words, first mention of the subject on the thread:

That's funny, why then did Palin endorse and campaign for her in a previous election?

If you had any honor, you would either back up that claim or retract it. But instead, you are now trying to put the burden of proof on me. I wonder why?

BTW, I can provide a link that Palin backed Murkowski's primary opponent in 2004.

27 posted on 06/16/2010 9:38:47 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/04/challenger_to_sen_murkowski_hi.html

Palin endorsed Murkowski's 2004 primary opponent, so a Miller endorsement would make a lot of sense inside Alaska.

-----------

I've backed up my claim, Bob. Where is your proof of your claim you made in post 10?

28 posted on 06/16/2010 9:42:44 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Dude, in #16 I said it was her father that was the Murkowski she campaigned for, not Lisa. I got my Murkowski’s mixed up and corrected it. You were the one who reinforced the belief that she endosed her rival in the primary than switched in the general.

If she didn’t endorse her in the 2004 general I wouldn’t be surprised. Palin was thick with animosity at being passed over for LT. Governor position. The feud between the two families goes back to 2003.


29 posted on 06/16/2010 9:46:54 AM PDT by Bob J (Support "4" Palin is more religious crusade than political movement. Nothing evil but buyer beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Post 10, Bob:

That's funny, why then did Palin endorse and campaign for her in a previous election?

Provide proof or retract.

30 posted on 06/16/2010 9:48:09 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I got my Murkowski’s mixed up and corrected it.

No, you got caught pulling it out of your arse, Bob. You truly are a pathetic slug.

31 posted on 06/16/2010 9:49:35 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

So, do you believe in making up attacks on Palin out of whole cloth as well?


32 posted on 06/16/2010 9:58:20 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

She opposed Lisa in the primary. She stuck with the party choice after that likely because it was better than backing the DEMOCRAT! Sheesh, you stuck on stupid or something?


33 posted on 06/16/2010 9:58:43 AM PDT by Danae (If Liberals were only moderately insane, they would be tollerable. Alas, such is not the case.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mojave; Bob J

Her excuses are worse than the deed itself ;-) ;-)


34 posted on 06/16/2010 10:04:19 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Read the thread. Bob made up the claim about Palin supporting Lisa M. in a previous election.


35 posted on 06/16/2010 10:05:42 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Zathras; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican

She’s clearly worse than Bennett. She’s worse than McCain. She’s the worst incumbent Republican Senator who’s running again this year.

I’m glad and pleasantly surprised conservatives are serious about taking her down.


36 posted on 06/16/2010 10:06:48 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

At least I’m not an anal rententive bung hole.


37 posted on 06/16/2010 10:07:26 AM PDT by Bob J (Support "4" Palin is more religious crusade than political movement. Nothing evil but buyer beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Bad Bob, quit humping threads.

You are getting closer and closer to getting fixed. I am calling the vet and making an appointment.

38 posted on 06/16/2010 10:08:01 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
At least I’m not an anal rententive bung hole.

It's spelled retentive.

39 posted on 06/16/2010 10:09:46 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Danae
She stuck with the party choice

Damn the principles, full steam ahead!

40 posted on 06/16/2010 10:12:18 AM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson