Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL

“Legal scholars laugh out loud at Republican state Sen. Russell Pearce’s proposal and warn that it would be blatantly unconstitutional, since the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the U.S.”

A flat lie.


2 posted on 06/15/2010 12:56:05 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan

“A flat lie.”

Flat, not in this case. Their lies are usually large and dirigible shaped because they contain large volumes of foul smelling gas.


8 posted on 06/15/2010 1:03:50 PM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (We are an Oligarchy now and worse if we fail. TeaParty On...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Based upon Section 1, I don't see how the good Senator can deny the children US Citizenship. Now, saying that the parents have to leave, and they are welcome to take their American children with them, is another matter altogether.

10 posted on 06/15/2010 1:04:38 PM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan
A flat lie.

SECOND THAT. Journalists, so called, need to do a little homework.
21 posted on 06/15/2010 1:23:26 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan
A flat lie.

True. Equal protection, yes.

But isn't it interesting how the Libs will hide behind the Constitution when it suits their needs? 1st Amendment? 2nd Amendment? Fa! Outdated and antiquated! But let someone threaten a Lefty's Sacred Cow and it's 'Hold The Phone!'

28 posted on 06/15/2010 2:04:51 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (You can only get smarter by engaging a smarter opponent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson