Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/12/2010 10:07:26 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: Liz; mkjessup; stephenjohnbanker; fieldmarshaldj; DoughtyOne; AuntB; exit82; TigersEye; ...
"I fought against my own party and fought against President (George W.) Bush… and you may not like some of the positions I've taken but I am a proud Ronald Reagan conservative and I am proud of my record and I'll match it up against anybody's."

FUJM!


2 posted on 06/12/2010 10:10:41 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

***Revisionist History Alert***


3 posted on 06/12/2010 10:11:15 AM PDT by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

He is delusional and needs a treatment facility for the lost. Else he is a liar.


4 posted on 06/12/2010 10:11:26 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Donald Trump has perfected the Art of the Deal....and McLiar has perfected the Art of the Spin.

I'll take Trump.....at least with him a deal's a deal.

With McCain his deal with the voters will be aborted the minute he's sworn in again as a senator.

Leni

7 posted on 06/12/2010 10:16:30 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Bill O'Reilly: 9/8/09: "Communism is not a threat to us anymore" - 10/20/09 "Obama is not a Marxist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
secure the border

That is the same old canard [a deliberately misleading fabrication] politicans have used for years.

Note that they never say how.

Note that they never mean 'seal' the border and stop all illegal traffic.

Secure the border is a meaningless canard that sounds good but means nothing -- without the follow-up of how.
11 posted on 06/12/2010 10:35:59 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Please boot this clown out once and for all, Arizona (along with his liberal wife and daugther). He doesn’t own that Senate seat, although he seems to think he does.


14 posted on 06/12/2010 10:44:23 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

GO JD!! Retire this old RINO!!

Rebellion is brewing!!


16 posted on 06/12/2010 10:58:58 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

McCain fought hard for the unconstitutional economy-killing TARP and the bailouts. He fought hard for the liberty killing, free speech suppressing, unconstitutional, incumbency protection act aka McCain-Feingold. He fought hard for AMNESTY. He joined the Democrats fighting against confirming GWB’s SCOTUS picks. He crossed the aisle and fought hard for “climate change” and will do all of the above plus even more damage to the causes of freedom and national security if he is reelected. The senile old warhorse needs to be sent out to pasture. Don’t allow him to die of old age in office like the Democrats do. This guy is waaaay past his prime.


19 posted on 06/12/2010 11:15:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

“McCain defends his Conservatism”

In similar news:

“TitansAFC defends his superhuman powers.”


22 posted on 06/12/2010 11:41:58 AM PDT by TitansAFC ("At that point in time (2000 race), McCain was as conservative if not more so than GWB." --- pissant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

McCain is a lying skunk. I don’t know if JD can beat the Democrat candidate, but I would let him try. McCain is in the “we know best” category of legislator. He only kisses up to public opinion when he is in political trouble like now.


23 posted on 06/12/2010 11:45:49 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

“McCain defends his conservatism”

All that one need know about McJackass’ “conservatism” is that it is the kind of conservatism that the likes of Michael Medved and David Frum are comfortable with.


25 posted on 06/12/2010 11:52:40 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 14 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
“I will be glad to… put my record for being a fiscal conservative up against anybody's."

OK McLame! For starters let’s compare your voting record to J.D. Hayworth!

Hayworth’s American Conservative Union’s (ACU) and National Journal’s (NJ) conservative voting record scores crush your scores across the board!

Photobucket

See American Thinker’s article: McCain and Hayworth: Tale of the Tape : “Who is more conservative -- John McCain or J.D. Hayworth?”

Conservative? Pfff! You are a RINO statist to the core.

30 posted on 06/12/2010 12:10:20 PM PDT by kara2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Whatever Conservatism McCain had retired with his uniform.


31 posted on 06/12/2010 12:13:54 PM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

McCain is like an abusive spouse and the Arizona voters are like a battered wife that always takes the SOB back after a beating. Personally I’ve hated the POS for years. Nothing would give me more pleasure than seeing him humiliated this time around.


33 posted on 06/12/2010 12:28:23 PM PDT by Blado (Oilbama's dream: ''Spill Baby, Spill.'' Legal disclaimer- all criticism of white male half only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

McCain is a liberal POS. One has to wonder just how much closer to being kicked to the curb he would be had Sarah Palin not endorsed his liberal arse.


35 posted on 06/12/2010 12:31:42 PM PDT by South40 ("Islam has a long tradition of tolerance." ~Hussein Obama, June 4, 2009, Cairo, Egypt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385; All

“I stood up when other people were earmarking and pork barreling and (involved in) corruption. I investigated Abramoff… and he eventually ended up in jail”

This ugly little runt is the master of spin. He investigated....and stopped the investigation when it got to him!

Indians, Lobbyists and Arizona Politics...OH MY!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2440173/posts

McCain Received $100,000 From Firm Of Abramoff Notoriety

A review of campaign finance filings shows that the Arizona Republican has accepted more than $100,000 in donations from employees of Greenberg Traurig, the very firm where Abramoff once reigned.

And while the report pushed for greater transparency and accountability, towards the end, McCain and the other authors seemingly put the onus for change not on Congress itself, but on the tribes that Abramoff bilked.

Those donations include several thousand dollars from registered lobbyists who represent, or have represented, businesses such as NewsCorp, Rupert Murdoch’s media empire; Spi Spirits, a Cyprus based company that has fought with the Russian government for the rights to the Stolichnaya vodka brand name; El Paso Corp, a major energy company; General Motors; and the Essential Worker Immigration Coalition, a group of businesses and trade associations “concerned” about the shortage of lesser skilled and unskilled labor.

All told, McCain has received more than $400,000 from lobbying firms, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. And among his major fundraisers (”bundlers”) 59 have been identified as lobbyists by the non-profit organization Public Citizen.

[snips] McCain portrays himself as a Washington maverick unswayed by special interests, referring recently to lobbyists as “birds of prey.” Yet in his current campaign, more than 40 fund-raisers and top advisers have lobbied or worked for an array of gambling interests - including tribal and Las Vegas casinos, lottery companies, and online poker purveyors.

When rules being considered by Congress threatened a California tribe’s planned casino in 2005, McCain helped spare the tribe. Its lobbyist, who had no prior experience in the gambling industry, had a nearly 20-year friendship with McCain.”

McCain has been chair of the Indian affairs committee since 2005, having served on it for many years prior. He used this position to bring down Abramoff, who was second only to handing out tribe dollars to McCain’s man Scott Reed. Some have speculated the move was not so much to rid politics of the likes of Abramoff, but to gain a monopoly on tribe campaign dollars. There’s even a book, ‘The Perfect Villain: John McCain and the Demonization of Jack Abramoff’ speculating McCain’s motives.

In one such article, Chuck Muth writes:

“When stories of Jack Abramoff taking various Indian tribes to the cleaners first hit the press, McCain - Chairman of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee and author of the un-American, anti-free speech McCain-Feingold campaign censorship law - decided this would be an excellent opportunity to settle some old scores, help out some old pals, and do what Sen. McCain does best...get media attention for Sen. McCain.

As the Washington insider newspaper The Hill reported in March 2004, McCain wrote at least one letter on Senate letterhead praising Reed to one of Abramoff’s clients, the Saginaw Chippewa. Five days later, Abramoff was fired and the Saginaw Chippewa tribe retained Reed. In addition, columnist Bob Novak reported last December that on the eve of the investigation’s hearings, Reed handed some $200,000 in bundled contributions to McCain. Does this smell, or what?

The thing is, this McCain “investigation” looks like a real scandal in and of itself. If there are/were actual crimes involved, that’s what the Justice Department is for, not the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. Instead, McCain appears to be using his committee and his position to (a) grandstand for his 2008 presidential campaign, (b) pay back conservatives who opposed him in 2000, and (c) scratch the back of a well-heeled lobbyist who is scratching right back. “

_______________

An interesting note. McCain, as head of Indian Affairs in congress, refused to work on any issues except Abramoff (not really that committee’s venue to start with) and has irritated many of the tribal people over this.

http://64.38.12.138/News/2005/010493.asp


top individual recipient of Indian gaming money during election 2000 was none other than anti-soft money crusader Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who sits on the Senate Committee of Indian Affairs.

_______________

John McCain, Indian Agent

I thought the days of Indian Agents deceptively crafting words to steal land and resulting in forced relocation were long gone, but now there’s a republican presidential candidate running sliming for the highest office in the land,who’s done just that. McCain introduced legislation (S1973-1 and S.1003) and claimed that legislation was justified by a non-existent range war between the Dineh and the Hopi.

http://www.nativeamericannetroots.net/diary/87/
_______________


37 posted on 06/12/2010 12:47:34 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Did he once say “I was wrong” ??


41 posted on 06/12/2010 12:53:16 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

WHAT CONSERVATISM?


43 posted on 06/12/2010 1:00:39 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

defends it??? I’m amazed that he could find it.


45 posted on 06/12/2010 1:08:16 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("The real death threat is their legislation" Rush Limbaugh, 3/25/10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

I don’t understand. He’s growing rare birds on his property?


46 posted on 06/12/2010 1:22:18 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson