Saint Sarah [Newsweek's Full Bore Palin Attack]

Newsweek ^ | June 11, 2010 | Lisa Miller

[DoughtyOne]

Thank you Pissant. They sure are.

[marstegreg]

Wow! Thanks for the heads up. What a great read. My sons watch a show called "the Deadliest Warrior" where they have 2 historical warriors and their weapons face each other to see who would have won. The reason I brought this up is because this is like watching a warrior with gunpowder face a warrior with mere bows and arrows. It was definitely a slaughter!

[stephenjohnbanker]

Glad you enjoyed it ;-)

[unseen1]

did you come up with that all by yourself? Or did your mommy help you with the dirty words?

[unseen1]

ROFL. D1 is a delusional poster that makes skyscrapers out of clouds.

[unseen1]

Long? You got too much time on your hands do you ever leave the basement?

the record is the record. you can spin it how you want. JD voted to increase spending across the board. He sided with Bush and the GOP congress form 2000-2006 on almost every item. he and all GOP members of the 2000-2006 congress were responsible for the biggest increase in Federal government power and spending ever seen up to Obama’s crowning.
you think electing people that enabled that will help stop the power grab? One word: delusional.

again pointing out faults of someone does not mean support for the other guy. you seem to have a problem accepting the truth. If you want to hide in your land of delusion and think that JD will vote the conservative ticket when a liberal GOPer like Mitt is in the WH go ahead. You will be disappointed.

McCain is no better. hopefully he will do a Bryd and Az can get a real conservative to run in the next primary instead of the beltway GOPers like JD and McCain.

[mkjessup]

ROFL. D1 is a delusional poster that makes skyscrapers out of clouds.

You are a total dipsh*t, a liar, and a troll.

You've been exposed for all of FR to see. If you had one ounce of integrity, you would slink off back to McCain HQ and report your total failure as a shill and never darken this forum again.

But go ahead and continue to make a fool out of yourself. You can't refute one bloody word that DoughtyOne has posted because he deals in truth and facts, while you deal in nothing but lies, deception, and twisting data to suit your own purposes, just like your fallen idol McCain.

GTF outta here troll, your number is up and it's ZERO.

[mkjessup]

Long? You got too much time on your hands do you ever leave the basement?

Refute what DoughtyOne has said. Prove that what he posted is not true. You can't, because you don't have the intellectual firepower, being the little cockroach of a troll that you are.

[mkjessup]

did you come up with that all by yourself? Or did your mommy help you with the dirty words?

Speaking of mommies, you still haven't figured out why there was a wire coat hanger stuck in your skull on the day you were born, now have you?

[stephenjohnbanker]

T R O L L

[DoughtyOne]

ROFL. D1 is a delusional poster that makes skyscrapers out of clouds.

I have responed on point to your posts on this fourm.

I used facts, provided links, and explained real world reality to reveal what you were doing and why it was wrong.

The terms you use to belittle my responses, are meaningless.  My responses stand on their own, and your baseless criticisms fail on their own.

LINK

[mkjessup]

That saying about "Casting your pearls before swine" comes to mind D1.


[w/apologies to all the more honorable swine out there]

[DoughtyOne]

Long? You got too much time on your hands do you ever leave the basement?

You tossed out eleven different charges in an effort to belittle Hayworth.  You did it in a manner that did not include, alternative bill names, alternate issues included in the same bills or resolutions, bill numbers, dates, vote counts, resolution numbers, people voting with Hayworth, or people voting against Hayworth.

Unable to deal with my response on point, you are left with no choice but to belittle me for providing all the things you didn't, so folks could cleary see through what you are up to.

I don't have a basement.  If I did, I would spend months there to provide information that reveals what type of person you are, and what you are up to.

the record is the record. you can spin it how you want.

You have spun it.  Now you're upset that I have explained what actually took place.  My heart bleeds for you.

JD voted to increase spending across the board.

J. D. voted for bills and resolutions like the best members of his party did, and unlike the worst members of the Democrat party did.  People who are generally very good when it comes to taxes and spending voted with J. D.  People who are terrible on spending and taxation, voted opposite of him.

He sided with Bush and the GOP congress form 2000-2006 on almost every item.

And he didn't side with these folks on almost every item during the same period, Nancy Pelosi(D), Tom Lantos(D), Henry Waxman(D), Maxine Waters(D), Jane Harman(D), Robert Wexler(D), Rahm Emanuel(D), John Conyers(D), Jerald Nadler(D), Charles Rangel(D), Dennis Kucinich(D), John Murtha(D), Patrick Kennedy(D), Bernard Sanders(I).

he and all GOP members of the 2000-2006 congress were responsible for the biggest increase in Federal government power and spending ever seen up to Obama’s crowning.

So what you are saying is that you wish he had voted with Nancy Pelosi(D), Tom Lantos(D), Henry Waxman(D), Maxine Waters(D), Jane Harman(D), Robert Wexler(D), Rahm Emanuel(D), John Conyers(D), Jerald Nadler(D), Charles Rangel(D), Dennis Kucinich(D), John Murtha(D), Patrick Kennedy(D), Bernard Sanders(I).

you think electing people that enabled that will help stop the power grab? One word: delusional.

What I believe is that it would have been far worse if J. D. Hayworth had voted with Nancy Pelosi(D), Tom Lantos(D), Henry Waxman(D), Maxine Waters(D), Jane Harman(D), Robert Wexler(D), Rahm Emanuel(D), John Conyers(D), Jerald Nadler(D), Charles Rangel(D), Dennis Kucinich(D), John Murtha(D), Patrick Kennedy(D), Bernard Sanders(I).

Not understanding this, you call me dilusional.  I'm comfortable with that.

again pointing out faults of someone does not mean support for the other guy.

There are two prominent people running, and you have spent all your time here trashing J. D. Hayworth, and explaining why it was a better idea to return John S. McCain to the Senate of the United States for another six years.  None the less, you still claim that you don't support McCain any more than you do J. D. Hayworth.

We've now been conducting this exchange for seventeen days, but you don't really give a damn which way the election goes, according to you.  And yet, you think folks are supposed to believe I am the dilusional one.

you seem to have a problem accepting the truth.

No, I've accepted what your truth is.  That hasn't stopped me from revealing what that truth was for all to see.  I accept it for what it is.  I have destroyed it for what it is.  No problem.

If you want to hide in your land of delusion and think that JD will vote the conservative ticket when a liberal GOPer like Mitt is in the WH go ahead.

Here you go again, revealing how unbiased you truly are when it comes to this election.

You will be disappointed.

I have seen what John S. McCain has done.  I would term my reaction to be way beyond simple disappointment.  I would term it more like the recognition of treason to the Conservative mindset in this nation.

You're just going to have to learn to live with my willingness to accept a little disappointment here and there, rather than see someone destroy our nation with the likes of Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Russel Feingold, George Soros, Teressa Heinz Kerry, the Tides Foundation.  John's activity is available here for all to see.  LINK

Here are the people you claim are more Conservative than Hayworth on most of the votes you criticized him for.

Nancy Pelosi(D), Tom Lantos(D), Henry Waxman(D), Maxine Waters(D), Jane Harman(D), Robert Wexler(D), Rahm Emanuel(D), John Conyers(D), Jerald Nadler(D), Charles Rangel(D), Dennis Kucinich(D), John Murtha(D), Patrick Kennedy(D), Bernard Sanders(I)

McCain is no better.

You have spent seventeen days trashing J. D. Hayworth.  You gave me a trumped up list of supposed violations that J. D. executed, even though he was voting against Nancy Pelosi(D), Tom Lantos(D), Henry Waxman(D), Maxine Waters(D), Jane Harman(D), Robert Wexler(D), Rahm Emanuel(D), John Conyers(D), Jerald Nadler(D), Charles Rangel(D), Dennis Kucinich(D), John Murtha(D), Patrick Kennedy(D), Bernard Sanders(I), with the same votes.  You have in certain posts on this thread explained why the good people of Arizona should return McCain to the Senate for six more years, because he has seniority.  And yet, at the same time, you want me to buy off on the idea you don't want McCain returned to the Senate.

Expletive deleted, you!

hopefully he will do a Bryd and Az can get a real conservative to run in the next primary instead of the beltway GOPers like JD and McCain.

J. D.'s voting record is just fine.  Condor51 provided comments and links above.  For J.D.'s 12 years in Congress, he was rated at 97.56% when his votes were evaluated by the American Conservative Union (ACU).  In 2006, J. D.'s rating was 96%.  In 2006 John S. McCain's voting record was 65%.  LINK

Your attempt to destroy J. D. Hayworth is disgusting.

Nobody would go to the lengths you have to smear Hayworth over seventeen days without having a boner for John S. McCain.

I would encourage folks to read the post you are responding to here.  They need to see you for what you are.

[DoughtyOne]

I hear ya.