Posted on 06/02/2010 10:37:29 PM PDT by Gen-X-Dad
Splash! Could that be the sound of Lord Mandelson hitting one of the Dolce hotel’s four pools? Or Robert Zoellick of the World Bank? Paul Volcker of the US Economic Recovery Advisory Board? Or merely the euro taking another dive?
That is the thing about the Bilderberg group’s top secret meetings: you never know quite what is going on behind the police checkpoints.
Across the world, secretaries to the rich and the powerful have blocked out the next three days in their bosses’ calendars for their annual gathering, this time at the Dolce in Sitges, one of Spain’s most exclusive resorts
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
Or maybe not.
The Bilderberg group was actually covered on the CTV [ akin to an ABC / NBC / CBS etc. ] News program in 2006 when the group was meeting in Ottawa. So I think the cat is out of the bag on this group despite the American network blackout.
The truth is coming out & few bother to deny it anymore now.
I’d like some fries with that!
One problem with your scenario: almost everyone who believes in these Bilderberg/NWO conspiracies also hold that the Jews are responsible.
Neo-con is a euphemism for Jew.
Neo-con is not a euphemism for Jew.
Neoconservatism Made Kristol Clear
by Michael Tennant
Memo to Irving Kristol: Get yourself to a secure, undisclosed location immediately if not sooner. You are in grave danger. No, you needn’t worry about receiving threats from left-wing loonies like Al Gore or his disciple, the Unabomber. You don’t even have to fear the paleoconservatives and libertarians. You should, however, keep your eyes open for members of the National Review/Wall Street Journal crowd. IMPORTANT: If you receive a package in the mail from David Frum, call the bomb squad immediately!
Why do I say Irving Kristol had better keep a close eye on his allies on the “official” right? Simply this: He recently wrote a piece for The Weekly Standard in which he spelled out exactly what neoconservatism is. What’s worse is that ol’ Irv’s description of neoconservatism proves that it is everything its critics have said it is—and worse.
Now that “the ‘godfather’ of all those neocons,” as Kristol describes himself, has spoken on the subject (and written a book entitled Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea), the NR/WSJ crowd can no longer plausibly deny the existence of such a movement, as some have tried to do. In addition, they can no longer plausibly claim that neoconservatism is merely another form of traditional conservatism. Nor can they plausibly insist that neoconservatism has anything at all to do with the American founding and tradition of limited government and avoidance of entangling alliances. Kristol has blown all these arguments out of the water.
Kristol first points out that neoconservatism had “its origin among disillusioned liberal intellectuals in the 1970s,” just in case anyone had any doubts about its ancestry. At this time the grassroots of the Republican Party, and indeed much of Middle America , was still largely wedded to the ideas of small government at home and a reasonably prudent foreign policy abroad. Barry Goldwater—who Kristol says is “politely overlooked” in the neocon pantheon of “20th-century heroes,” while FDR is included—had, after all, been the Republican presidential nominee in 1964; and Ronald Reagan, who at least espoused relatively conservative ideas even if he didn’t follow through on most of them once in office, was to be elected president in 1980. In other words, neocon ideas were not the ideas of the mainstream right at the time, and their prospects weren’t even looking very bright.
So, says Kristol, “one can say that the historical task and political purpose of neoconservatism would seem to be this: to convert the Republican party, and American conservatism in general, against their respective wills, into a new kind of conservative politics suitable to governing a modern democracy.” It’s easy to see the liberal—and, indeed, Straussian, as Kristol claims Leo Strauss as one of the forerunners of neoconservatism—mind at work here. We, the enlightened ones, will “convert” you, the unenlightened, from your backward, parochial ways to our progressive, global ways; and we will do so against your will, by deception if possible, by force if necessary
More or less, Neocon as a euphemism for “jew” is to my eyes merely a deflection from their actual policies.
Oddly enough, Rush Limbaugh has attended Bilderberger gatherings.
And, Rush is taking the next week and a half off. Que the Twilight Zone theme music......
Drudge’s title
BILDERBURG 2010: Secret meeting of world’s financial elite could decide fate of Euro...
I’m with the protesters when it comes to these amoral thugs.
For those that are foolish enough to think this is tin foil hat black helicopter conspiracy...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group#Participants
Free Trade bump.
I saw some show about them on TV not too long ago. Very interesting and strange. I don’t know much about them but I am curious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.