Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mullen: Military should have been able to complete review before gay ban repeal
The Hill ^ | May 30, 2010 | Bridget Johnson

Posted on 05/30/2010 9:45:38 AM PDT by jazusamo

Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) said Sunday that Congress should have waited until the Defense Department completed its troop survey before moving forward with legislation to repeal the "Don't ask, don't tell" ban on gays serving openly in the military.

"I would've preferred that the legislation was not brought forward until we were done with review," Mullen told Candy Crowley this morning on CNN's "State of the Union."

"I have said I think it is important to get through this review," said Mullen, who supports ending the ban. "It's really critical to understand the points of view of who it affects the most."

The House passed legislation attached to a defense authorization bill on Friday that would repeal the ban and a Senate panel acted on Thursday, with Webb voting against the plan.

Webb wouldn't provide his support for a repeal, saying he will defer to what soldiers say they want.

"I'm really disappointed in the way the process was accelerated," Webb said. "I believe we had a process in place and to preempt it shows a disrespect for the people in the military.

"Ideally the survey would be in place before we legislate," Webb said. "Congress is jumping ahead despite the need to have some resolution on the issue."

The repeal wouldn't go into effect any earlier than 60 days after enactment and Mullen said a plan for implementation would likely take longer. Mullen, Defense Department Secretary Robert Gates and the Obama administration will determine how to best install the changes. President Barack Obama has called for an end to the policy.

When it gets implemented is "still in play" in ways that "makes this review in collecting the information and understanding what's going on at the death plate level from our troops and our families that much more critical," Mullen said. "We will complete that review and certainly incorporate what we learned from that into implementation when that time comes."

Former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Colin Powell said Sunday he supports the repeal of the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy as long as military leaders are allowed to weigh in on the change.

"I'm personally of the view now that attitudes and have changed and i think it's perfectly acceptable to get rid of the law and the policy," said Powell, also a former secretary of State, said on ABC's "This Week." "But before we actually do it we have to hear clearly from the officers, the men and women who are in charge of executing this policy."

Powell backed the ban on gays serving openly when it was implemented in the 1990s and when he was President Bill Clinton's top military adviser.

Powell said the military should have time to study the issue before implementing a new policy, siding with Mullen and Gates. He said it was important to listen to troops who will be affected.

Powell cautioned policy makers not to underestimate issues such as domestic partnerships and same-sex marriage that were also dealt with when the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy began in 1993.

"How do we actually implement this in a way that strengthens the force?" Powell said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dadt; democrats; dontaskdonttell; homosexualagenda; mullen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: FlingWingFlyer

If 1.5 million leave a note on their bunks saying adios the day after this goes into effect, will any of the elite gerbil stuffers get the message????


21 posted on 05/30/2010 12:42:41 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Get more MRE’s out to Levenworth STAT, they’re gonna get a whole bunch of new tenents.


22 posted on 05/30/2010 12:45:21 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

Just thought of a silver lining. But first of all, I hope this gets stonewalled until after Nov when hopefully the Evil party will be in the minority in Congress.

Here's the silver - this will most likely seriously rile up many in the military who might have not yet realized what a steaming pile of all that is bad is squatting in the White House. Politicize and activate 'em. That is a good thing. No one can really become an evil dictator without the military on their side.

23 posted on 05/30/2010 3:52:44 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"How do we actually implement this in a way that strengthens the force?" Powell said.

We can't.

The real question is, how can this policy be implemented and cause the least damage to the force?

24 posted on 05/30/2010 4:36:07 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It appears that there are going to be more than enough votes to stop this in the Senate even if we lose a couple NE Republicans.


25 posted on 05/30/2010 6:10:37 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Tyranny thrives when the people are silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Thanks, I hope so.

It’d be great to see the Senate support our military in spite of Zer0 and the leftists going after the gay vote.


26 posted on 05/30/2010 6:18:48 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Keep me posted, if you will.


27 posted on 05/30/2010 8:00:18 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Someone please tell me, what does “serve openly” actually mean?

The question is what will 'serve openly' be CONSTRUED to mean by homosexuals, liberal Democrats, and their Fuhrer?

Observe how the opinion in Lawrence v. Texas was construed from the right to practice sodomy in the privacy of one's own home, to the right to impose radical redefinition of marriage on society, the enacting of "hate-crime" legislation, and the right to public homosexual sex.

28 posted on 05/31/2010 12:26:59 AM PDT by fwdude (It is not the liberals who will destroy this country, but the "moderates.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson