Skip to comments.
White House Memo on Sestak Discussions Refutes Alleged Misconduct
abc ^
| 5/28/10
| jake tapper
Posted on 05/28/2010 3:03:52 PM PDT by Nachum
Refuting allegations that the Obama administration offered Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Pa., a job in exchange for dropping out of the contested Pennsylvania Democratic senate primary earlier this month, the White House says an internal investigation shows nothing improper took place and "that the allegations of improper conduct rest on factual errors and a lack of basis in the law."
In a memo released to the press, White House counsel Robert Bauer says no White House staff made such a proposition to Sestak and that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel only worked through former President Bill Clinton to discuss "options of service on a Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board."
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.abcnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: house; memo; sestak; sestakgate; white
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
1
posted on
05/28/2010 3:03:52 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
2
posted on
05/28/2010 3:04:11 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
How many months did it take to come up with this bullcrap.
3
posted on
05/28/2010 3:04:38 PM PDT
by
Carley
(DADDY DIDN'T PLUG THE HOLE YET)
To: Nachum
Did anybody expect anything else?
4
posted on
05/28/2010 3:04:55 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The Founders revolted for less.)
To: Carley
Amazing how just happens to surface... today.
5
posted on
05/28/2010 3:05:04 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
Oh, OK, so I guess that clears it all up.
To: Nachum
and that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel only worked through former President Bill Clinton to discuss "options of service on a Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board." The law says directly or indirectly and says that a position is enough - it doesn't have to be a paying job - when the White House is making an offer to affect an election. The memo says no, but the trail of evidence says yes.
7
posted on
05/28/2010 3:07:54 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(I am so immune to satire that I ate three Irish children after reading Swift's "A Modest Proposal")
To: Nachum
"that the allegations of improper conduct rest on factual errors and a lack of basis in the law."Is this similar to "No controlling authority"?
8
posted on
05/28/2010 3:08:04 PM PDT
by
w1andsodidwe
(How can you tell when the President is lying? When his lips move, of course.)
To: Nachum
9
posted on
05/28/2010 3:11:11 PM PDT
by
Carley
(DADDY DIDN'T PLUG THE HOLE YET)
To: Nachum
Oh, okay. Nothing to see here. Let’s all go back to sleep while the dems and Zero continue looting and pillaging.
10
posted on
05/28/2010 3:11:24 PM PDT
by
hershey
To: KarlInOhio
Ooops, time to subpoena the emails. Maybe even impound the Prez’s Blackberry.
To: Nachum
The WH memo doesn't refute anything and as a matter of fact, it verifies the WH offered Sestak a job to drop out of the race which is a crime.
12
posted on
05/28/2010 3:12:28 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
To: Nachum
Nothing here to see! move along. The Rat’s have covered their trail.
13
posted on
05/28/2010 3:13:28 PM PDT
by
ncfool
(The new USSA - United Socialst States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world.)
To: Nachum
When did Jake Tapper go brain dead?
How would an unpaid appointment to an obscure Presidential committee be an incentive to forego a run for the U. S. Senate? “Gee, just what I hoped for: an uncompensated seat on a nowhere committee. Possibly more work for no money.”
To: Nachum
It's now officially a cover-up.
15
posted on
05/28/2010 3:17:42 PM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: ncfool
The Rats have covered their trail.Ipse dixit. They admitted it in their own memo! It's a trail all its own. Their approach appears to be simply to claim that something that is against the law, isn't, even though the meaning of the law is plain.
To: Nachum
Does anyone believe this administration will tell the truth?
17
posted on
05/28/2010 3:22:08 PM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Nachum
Amazing how it turned out to be a supposed unpaid job.
18
posted on
05/28/2010 3:23:34 PM PDT
by
Minn
(Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
To: freekitty
19
posted on
05/28/2010 3:23:37 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
You have to give the journalist credit. Must have been quite the feat to write this article with his face planted so firmly against Rahm Emmanual’s backside.
20
posted on
05/28/2010 3:25:54 PM PDT
by
Hoffer Rand
(There ARE two Americas: "God's children" and the tax payers)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson