If it wasn’t “important” to you, you would not have replied once to me let alone multiple times. I made a simple, factual post. You chose to try to convince me otherwise. Hence the debate which has come to its conclusion.
Debate? What debate? I stated things I experienced, you postulated opinions on why my experiences were “myth.”
If you feel so strongly about “patterns” perhaps you should avoid threads that refer to patterns, no matter how simplified the “pattern” may be. Personally (and this is only an opinion) I can debate patterns or the lack of same until the cows come home. Nothing personal, of course.
Just that some days, it’s fun to watch the natives get their shorts in a twist over a point of view.
If you prefer to argue against “patterns,” go for it. Patterns look best on fabric and in nature. Otherwise, they aren’t useful.
I would NEVER try to convince ANYone that my point of view is superior. It’s only a point of view, and subject to change with the perspective. Obviously, you have my confused with someone who delights in stubborn stupidity.
Life is too short to dance with ugly men.