Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pharmboy

“the article states, Warren might have met Washington”

Actually, from what I see, the grandparents claimed he was “friends with” Washington, and the officer did not say he met him. That can be altogether different - a few remote letters, etc., which sometimes for some people was indeed as intimate as they became in those days.


5 posted on 05/27/2010 6:11:34 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel
I was giving them the benefit of the doubt and not going for the "friends" claim. Washington had only been to Boston one time before arriving in July of 1775 to take command of the Continental Army (in 1758 to complain to General Shirley about his treatment by the Brit Army in the F&I War), and I have never heard of him meeting Warren much less befriending him during the earlier trip.

In all that I have read on the General, I think his knowing Warren would have been mentioned, but I am at a loss.

Further, I could not find any evidence that Warren attended any Philadelphia meetings that Washington had, so I remain skeptical but welcome being corrected. The only other thing that comes to mind is Washington's 1773 trip to NYC to place his stepson in King's College (Columbia), so meeting Warren there is a possibility.

And yes, I am aware of the importance of letters during the colonial period, but one would be hard-pressed to call anyone a friend whom you'd never met.

6 posted on 05/27/2010 6:34:31 AM PDT by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson