Skip to comments.
Obama to Deploy Up to 1,200 National Guard Troops to U.S.-Mexico Border
Fox News ^
| 5/25/2010
| Fox News
Posted on 05/25/2010 12:50:33 PM PDT by Dallas59
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: Dallas59
The POS should send 120,000 troops to the border.
41
posted on
05/25/2010 1:26:21 PM PDT
by
billuk1
To: mlocher
Plus he wants the money to be appropriated which means that should Congress cut it or refuse to provide it he can say he tried to do something but Congress wouldn’t go along with it.
He could work with SW governors and organize a force using DoD money very quickly. But he prefers to drag out the process and maybe even see it roadblocked by Pelosi& Co. who can say they will do nothing short of “comprehensive immigration reform.”
The border situation doesn’t fit Obama’s definition of an “emergency.” If Goldman Sachs made a plea for another Wall Street bailout, THAT would be a real crisis demanding hundreds of billions. But the Mexican border? Naw, the status quo is really not too bad from 0’s viewpoint.
42
posted on
05/25/2010 1:26:29 PM PDT
by
Scanian
To: AuntB
There's a dangerous, murderous hell-hole just north of the Canadian-US border where even most of that country's natives fear to go. Good citizens dread that the crime will flood southward into their peaceful neighborhoods.
(Yes, Detroit is north of Windsor).
43
posted on
05/25/2010 1:28:22 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(I am so immune to satire that I ate three Irish children after reading Swift's "A Modest Proposal")
To: Graybeard58
I do not use the sophomoric /s either. I know I know. Jeez, if ya can't at least use the post graduate sarcasm tag then why bother. I'm with you.
44
posted on
05/25/2010 1:28:49 PM PDT
by
mc5cents
To: Dallas59
How can Zero send national guard troops?? That’s a governor’s call.
To: ctdonath2
Good point. We need to throw this in liberal faces. Obama is militarizing the border! Obama is using the U.S. military to profile!
Let him have the worst of both worlds. Conservatives who know he is doing little and liberals who think he is violating our civil liberties.
To: Only1choice____Freedom
But its OK because they wont be allowed to have bullets.Bullets are useless unless there is a propulsion delivery system such as gunpowder, primer and case. Better known as a "cartridge."
47
posted on
05/25/2010 1:39:18 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
To: Dallas59
To do what? Pick up the trash and pass out water?
48
posted on
05/25/2010 1:39:42 PM PDT
by
ßuddaßudd
(7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona.....)
To: Dallas59
I am sure they are only there to stem the tide of illegal arms heading south.
49
posted on
05/25/2010 1:46:12 PM PDT
by
Colvin
(Proud Owner '66 Binder PU, '66 Binder Travelall,)
To: Dallas59
Zer0 is taking a pee in the ocean on this.
50
posted on
05/25/2010 1:48:21 PM PDT
by
RatRipper
(I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
To: Dallas59
what good is a few troops gonna do?
51
posted on
05/25/2010 1:53:29 PM PDT
by
tricia71
To: WKUHilltopper
Napolitano made the request when she was governor. I think she asked for about two or three times that many troops. Obama’s offer is too little, too late.
52
posted on
05/25/2010 1:54:55 PM PDT
by
Eva
(Aand)
To: Dallas59
Build fences. Quick Temporary ones first. Stronger permanent, multi-layer ones next. Close the border except for controlled entry and exit points.
53
posted on
05/25/2010 1:54:58 PM PDT
by
FreeAtlanta
(Hey, Barack "Hubris" Obama, $10 is all it would take, why spend millions to cover it up?)
To: RexBeach
how about pulling our 28,000 troops out of s. korea now! let the koreans thrash each other if they want. get our boys home safe and put them on OUR southern border. WIN-WIN situation imo. texassonofww11vet
To: Dallas59
55
posted on
05/25/2010 1:55:41 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Judas Iscariot - the first social justice advocate. John 12:3-6)
To: Eva
Well, if Napolitano was governor, she had the authority to call them up.
To: Dallas59
Will there be no ammo and maybe no guns carried by our Guard people?
Who will they be watching and protecting? The illegals or our citizens imperiled by the illegals?
57
posted on
05/25/2010 2:13:45 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
To: Dallas59
Let me guess, no guns allowed again along with strict orders to retreat at the firs sign of an illegal alien just like last time. PLEASE! Spare me more of this non-action government BS!
58
posted on
05/25/2010 2:16:47 PM PDT
by
Desron13
To: Dallas59
So what? They won’t be able to shoot back, and ICE won’t prosecute them.
So it’s nothing more than a political meaningless move.
59
posted on
05/25/2010 2:17:00 PM PDT
by
Freddd
(CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
To: Dallas59
“1200!” That’s about 1 for every 2 miles. Boy, that’s going to be really effective, isn’t it?
60
posted on
05/25/2010 2:18:42 PM PDT
by
attiladhun2
(The Free World has a new leader--his name is Benjamin Netanyahu)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson