Boxer fundraising tops $15 million

Orange County Register ^ | May 24th, 2010 | Dena Bunis

[South40]

Sen. Barbara Boxer’s re-election campaign fundraising has topping $15 million, with more to come at Tuesday night’s fundraiser in San Francisco with President Barack Obama.

The three-term Democratic incumbent raised $2 million from March 31 to May 19. Her campaign reported Monday that she has $9.6 million in the bank.

“So many of our supporters are watching Boxer attacked every day on television by our Republican opponents that they’re even more motivated,’’ said Boxer campaign manager Rose Kapolczynski. Boxer got $500,000 from April’s Los Angeles fundraiser with Obama and Kapolczynski hopes that is matched in San Francisco.

[whatisthetruth]

It’s not money that wins campaigns, it’s issues.

[DooDahhhh]

Hope they throw away more and more money to this hag.

[4rcane]

me wonder if tax payers money are involved in the donations

[4rcane]

i dunno how gop were considered the party of the rich when for the past decade or so, I keep seeing the democrats outraising gop multiple fold. Where all the rich republicans?

You can easily name all the big wealthy democrats
bill gates
warren buffet
steve jobs
eric smhmidt

[oldmomster]

wonder if any UNION money is involved - as they press for bailouts for their underfunded pensions/healthplansforlife.....hmmmmm?

[South40]

It’s not money that wins campaigns, it’s issues.

You couldn't be more wrong

[Halgr]

A POX upon the Boxer House.

[South40]

Lawyers and Hollyweird are/were her biggest contributors.

[South40]

Hollyweird loves her

[2aberro]

me wonder if tax payers money are involved in the donations

More likely from out of the country. What better way to destroy the USA than a boxer bomb.

[whatisthetruth]

Nobody pays voters to go to the ballot box and vote for a candidate who has a lot of money, they vote on the issues and only the issues.

[South40]

they vote on the issues and only the issues.

If you beleive that you're hopelessly lost in your own delusion. Good luck with that.

[whatisthetruth]

Yes that’s the way I vote and that’s the way everyone I know votes, if you believe that’s delusional, well who the hell cares, I certainly don’t.

[excalibur1701]

Senator Boxer’s request to a 4 star General “Could you say ‘senator’ instead of ‘ma’am? It’s just a thing. I worked so hard to get that title. I’d appreciate it.”

[tenger]

To which he should have responded, “Yes, Ma’am.” Anything else she does after that makes her look petty, not him.

[South40]

I beleive the statistics in the link I posted that say the candidate with the most money usually wins; that's backing up what I say with facts. You, on the other hand, are free to cling to your erroneous conclusion in spite of the fact that you have nothing to support it other than to say that's the way you vote.

Have a nice day.

[whatisthetruth]

Tell you what , you go vote based on who’s spending the most money, I’ll continue to go vote based on the issues. And thanks I will have a very nice day.

[South40]

You really are lost. This has nothing to do with how I vote, it has everything to do with the FACT that the candidate with the most money wins, a fact supported by statistics and a fact that you cannot refute.

Cheers

[whatisthetruth]

Don’t be ridiculous, it has everything to do with how you vote. People vote on the issues, not on who has the most money. Boxer can have all the money she wants but unless her issues resonate with the majority of Californians she will not win.