Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chris37

The last thing judges want people to realize is that the judge is little more than a glorified mediator in a jury trial.


17 posted on 05/22/2010 6:58:36 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

Yes, I’d have to say that he had a harder time mediating me. As I recall, this occurred a number of years ago, the judge being really mad said something along the lines of reprimanding me if I based my decision on whether or not a defendant testified or not.

But I was being as honest as I possibly could. I really wasn’t even trying to get out of the duty as this was my first ever call. To me, an attorney asking me to judge the guilt or innocence of a person without actually ever hearing a single word form that person is impossible, at least for me.

Essentially, if I was on trial, and I didn’t get on the stand to state in open court in front of my accuser that I am in fact innocent, then I would know that I was guilty.


18 posted on 05/22/2010 7:05:42 PM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson