Well, it's one of the byproducts of hanging on to a liberal court's and Pelosi's interpretation of the citizen clause in the constitution. It's one of the byproducts of believing the Founders intended for those who illegally invaded our country to get to squat out citizens. It's one of the byproducts of you thinking you peripheral knowledge of the subject is greater than that of those who have studied this for many years, including myself and many constitutionalists and scholars. So be it.
Here is one referenced in a George Will piece here.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/26/AR2010032603077.html
You have not give me ONE Constitutionally-based and well-reasoned argument for your proposal to change the Constitution.
I have too. Let me be clear, THE FOUNDERS DID NOT INTEND FOR ILLEGAL INVADERS, CITIZENS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES WHO ILLEGALLY ENTERED OUR TERRITORY TO BE GIVEN BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP FOR THEIR ILLEGAL SPAWN. It's that simple. You can cling to the open borders crowd's wet dream, but we are going to end it. I'll send you a box of kleenex when we do.
And of course you don't care how many constitutionally minded conservatives sponsor the bill. You desperately want the illegal spawn to be citizens. Just like Obama, Pelosi, and all the open borders advocates.
You arguments are just sad and pathetic, pissant. And by the way, do you know why your arguments stand out to me as racist? I am a member of the Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma on one side of my family. On the other, my family came down the so-called trail of tears. I understand what it means for the dominant society e to mistreat my family. Andrew Jackson set up the Andrew Jackson death march because he hated Indians and others who weren’t just like him. So before you start accusing others with a broad sweep of siding with the liberals—which you have accused me of—I want you to understand what you and those of who want to pursue a Constitutionally unjustified course of action, look like. You don’t look very good.