Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brady Center blows Firearms Freedom Act brief
Gun Rights Examiner ^ | 20 May, 2010 | David Codrea

Posted on 05/21/2010 6:32:55 AM PDT by marktwain

United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch has issued an order affecting the amicus brief submitted by the Brady Center in the Montana FFA case. (Click here to read it, along with the Department of Justice "Reply Memorandum").

Here's the order

----------------------------cut-------------------------

Good grief. So none of their co-signers "sought or received permission to" be listed? And their attorney didn't file the required motion to represent them?

If the gungrabbers can't manage a list this small, what makes them think a bigger one is such a hot idea?

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: banglist; brady; bradywatch; codrea; constitution; examiner; ffa; gun; statesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Their ranks are shrinking. Their funding is dropping. They only have support at the highest levels of National and international government, and in the media. Will they win?
1 posted on 05/21/2010 6:32:55 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

And don’t forget Sarah Brady made a straw purchase for a shotgun for her son.

A pox on all the hypocrites.


2 posted on 05/21/2010 6:34:57 AM PDT by Carley (WE CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Will they win? BO is working to impose his will on us thru the UN. They can’t win the battle through a frontal assault so they are working the flanks.


3 posted on 05/21/2010 6:36:26 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ..
"Will they win?"

No.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

4 posted on 05/21/2010 6:38:00 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
They should be disbanded as a criminal conspiracy and the leaders sent to jail for felonious violation of Title 18, Section 241.

Yes. I'm dead serious. I'll even sign off on the charges as a witness as well as a victim.

5 posted on 05/21/2010 6:41:43 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
They might end up trying, and succeeding, in passing another ban.

They won't "win" though.

Their doing so would trigger a backlash the likes of which this Country has never seen before. Not even during the Civil War.

6 posted on 05/21/2010 6:42:54 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
They should be disbanded as a criminal conspiracy and the leaders sent to jail for felonious violation of Title 18, Section 241.

Weak. I prefer a visit from Henry Bowman.

7 posted on 05/21/2010 7:02:51 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carley
And don’t forget Sarah Brady made a straw purchase for a shotgun for her son.

It was a bolt action 30-06 sniper rifle.

8 posted on 05/21/2010 7:32:59 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I would never use my scary evil firearm to stop Sarah Brady from being raped.


9 posted on 05/21/2010 7:39:54 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Boycott PA 12!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Brady Center blows Firearms Freedom Act brief

Sometimes fewer words convey the idea with more clarity.

10 posted on 05/21/2010 7:41:23 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley

While I freely admit she’s a loser and a collectivist trying to infringe on rights belonging to all of us, that wasn’t a straw purchase. As far as I’ve ever heard, the son isn’t barred from buying a gun himself. Form 4473 even states that purchasing a firearm as a gift for someone not prohibited isn’t a straw purchase.


11 posted on 05/21/2010 7:43:41 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Rules are for the little people.


12 posted on 05/21/2010 7:48:38 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Me too. But Soap, Ballot, and Jury should come first.


13 posted on 05/21/2010 7:50:04 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Their doing so would trigger a backlash the likes of which this Country has never seen before. Not even during the Civil War.

I'm interested to know why you think so. It didn't happen last time. Do you think people are more on the edge now?

14 posted on 05/21/2010 7:56:28 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Do you think people are more on the edge now?

Yes. Plus, the ban being talked about now is a REAL ban. "Mister and Misses America, turn 'em in" type thing. Not a temporary ban on a small classification of arms that could still be owned absent a couple of "scary" features.

Plenty of folks out there have that line drawn. More so now than before. They cross it, there will be blood.

15 posted on 05/21/2010 8:13:25 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

I think it was a different state, which as far as I know is a straw purchase.


16 posted on 05/21/2010 8:21:54 AM PDT by wastedyears (The Founders revolted for less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

I just recall the uproar when it was learned she made the purchase. I seem to recall but could be wrong that he was under the legal age to purchase.


17 posted on 05/21/2010 8:21:56 AM PDT by Carley (WE CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Carley

How did she do that?


18 posted on 05/21/2010 8:24:08 AM PDT by Double Tap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Ooooh.....


19 posted on 05/21/2010 8:24:21 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Double Tap

She purchased a 30 ought six rifle for her son. When caught she said it was to prove there are loopholes.

Google in Sarah Brady buys gun for son and read the articles.

Not owning any rifles I am way above my paygrade on the gun.


20 posted on 05/21/2010 8:29:55 AM PDT by Carley (WE CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson