They just don’t give up, do they?
"He currently chairs a study to evaluate the nuclear energy research program at DOE. Fri received his B.A. in physics from Rice University and his M.B.A. from Harvard University, and is a member of Phi Beta Kappa and Sigma Xi.".
Gee, why does a physicist need and MBA? Must be seeing dollar signs in "science".
Greenpeace activists burning a symbol of carbon dioxide in November 2008. In one of three multi-hundred-page reports on climate change by the National Research Council, scientists said the United States should set a budget that would limit greenhouse gas emissions to a total of between 170 and 200 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent between 2012 and 2050. (AFP/DDP/File/Theo Heimann)
Maybe it's a better idea to let physical scientists worry about physical "sciency" stuff, and let the economist worry about economic, to especially include our nation's tax policies. Just a though.
People who study the weather, should take a BIG swig of STFU, when speaking about other topics.
They couldn’t care less about people struggling to pay for gas and getting to work every morning. What the hell do they think we’re going to use to commute to work? Nonexistent mass transportation? Bicycles? Perhaps they don’t think about it all. Perhaps people are that worthless to them.
These freaks only care about saving the Earth Goddess.
PLEASE DON’T SUFFOCATE US OR WE WON’T BE ABLE TO MAKE THE OXYGEN YOU HUMANS REQUIRE TO LIVE.
Thanks,
The plants
Global Warming Hoax Deniers!
Zero's own "wizard" (the man behind the Chicago Climate Exchange) said that if we shut down the entire power generation / grid and transportation systems - eliminate all economic activity - we would only get to a 65% reduction.
That's the goal - bring down the last super power and quasi-free market society.
Some half baked idea every freaking day.
The signers of that joke are “top scientists” just about as much as the Obamaloon is a “top lawyer”.
Such a smelly pile of Bull Obama I have not seen since - yesterday.
The hyper-politicization of so-called science is one of the most disillusioning things that has happened in my lifetime.
This classic article by Dr Bruce Charlton is the best explanation I’ve seen of what is going on:
http://www.mantleplumes.org/WebDocuments/Charlton2008.pdf
#1 - who gave these quacks the title of “top scientists”? By what criteria? That they toe the Marxist line?
#2 - Yeah - what our blooming economy needs right now - dramatically HIGHER energy prices. Yeah - that will encourage a recovery (lest we forget that part of the economic fall had little to nothing to do with banks or mortgages - it was high energy prices...)
#3 - are these idiots still trying to use “global warming”?
These government whores are “scientists” like my dog is a board certified cardiologist.
“US top scientists”
Says who?
I don’t agree, they sound like used toilet paper.
Top scientists?
No actual physical scientists or engineers that I know of. I am a scientist and all this global warming stuff is hooey; nothing more than a socialist scheme to get us all to part with the contents of our wallets.
If the people who bring you the oil raise their prices, thats corporate greed and thats bad.
If people who don’t bring you the oil raise the price, thats good.
See?
They want the price to go up. They just don’t want the investors to make the money when it does.
Was Michael Mann one of those ‘top scientists’?