According to the media, everyone is “gay”...and socialist.
Oh please. All Kagan needs is the gigantic ring full of keys on her garrison belt to complete the picture.
BTW, how come our dykes look like Tammy Bruce, and their dykes all look like Jimmy Hoffa? Just asking.
She looks like Paul Blart: Mall Cop.
If she wants an END to “don’t ask, don’t tell” then why isn’t so also so forthcoming? It’s like the lavender mafia in the media who have a vested interest in the issue but are unwilling to step out of the closet in their anchor chairs.
Absolutely... is Chaz Bono gay... is oprah gay... you know they are!
LLS
Just because she likes flannel shirts and softball is no reason to jump to conclusions.
Who cares? I’m more concerned with her legal abilities and position on issues. We already know that as a lib she would support gay rights regardless of whether she is or not.
I don’t care if she’s Jewish. I don’t care if she’s gay. I care about her politics and how or if they are going to inform her judicial decisions. That’s what we have to be focused on. My guess is that anybody who passed muster with Obama is going to be seriously bad for the country, but not specifically because they are gay, Jewish, brunette, short, Martian-American, etc. (I know conservative gays and Jews, some on this forum. Not acquainted with any Martian-Americans AFAIK so I can’t pass judgment there.)
That's leftist code-speak for "I'm going to nominate a lesbian"
So is it better for someone to be openly gay, or gay but no one knows it?
The apropos question is, "does that affect her politics and judicial decision making?" Given that she's an academic and an O-hole, the answer has to be "yes."
Bull dyke. Yes, I said it.
I’m a little curious why anyone thinks it’s relevant that she’s Jewish or gay. My concern when it comes to this appointment is that Kagan is a socialist who has written shockingly anti-American commentaries, one who believes in the rule of whim rather than the rule of written law. As a fellow human being, I’m concerned regarding her salvation, but that’s not relevant to her appointment to a position that is far above the pay grade for which she is qualified. Let’s stick to the facts: she doesn’t believe the words of the Constitution are relevant to the job, so she is unqualified for a position on the Supreme COurt.
Well, she pees standing up
Andrew sure has a one track mind!
I don’t know about gay, but she looks happy.............
I saw here photo and I thought that it was a post-op Chastity Bono.
We all know that it doesn’t matter what the American public wants anymore. Our overlords in Congress would allow a mentally ill person to be on the Supreme Court because its politically correct to do it, and there isn’t a damn thing we can do about it because it’s going to happen before we can vote the bums out.