Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If someone's personal conduct doesn't reflect their characer, than what does? If a Justice nominee was a known LSD user, we would surely question their reasoning abilities. If they can't tell the difference between the male and female gender, doesn't that raise similar alarm bells? There is something deeply insane about a plump woman who uses another menacing looking, short-haired, man-hating 'female' as her sex partner and 'husband'. How have we gone this far off track?
1 posted on 05/10/2010 9:36:28 AM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: DesertRenegade
"She cannot be kept closeted not only from the public but from the inquiring minds of the media."

Oh, puhleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze...

2 posted on 05/10/2010 9:39:04 AM PDT by jessduntno (Kagan...Fili-bust her. Bork her. Bork her hard. She needs it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

Don’t forget that as dean of Harvard’s law school she banned military recruiters because she considered the “don’t ask, don’t tell policy” bigoted.

If she’s so opposed to “don’t ask don’t tell” she needs to prove it.


3 posted on 05/10/2010 9:40:14 AM PDT by BuckyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
Given the discussion that has already taken place about this, she ought to just say whether it's so or not. It's bound to come out (sorry) sooner or later.

4 posted on 05/10/2010 9:41:11 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

being homosexual is not shameful?

who wrote that?!


5 posted on 05/10/2010 9:42:06 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

She does need to openly proclaim her status as a fornicator. After all, isn’t she “proud” of her fornication?


6 posted on 05/10/2010 9:42:09 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

Is there really a question here? As a liberal, I would expect that it would have an impact on her judgment, but then again I would oppose all liberals to the Supreme Court, whether she was a lesbian or not.


7 posted on 05/10/2010 9:43:30 AM PDT by kevinm13 (Tim Geithner is a tax cheat. Manmade "Global Warming" is a HOAX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
She may not be able to admit it either, because it could cost her a Supreme Court post.

Ha!

In this Senate, it will be a big plus.

8 posted on 05/10/2010 9:44:52 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

The stakes are too high. Social conservatives must rise up as one and say no lesbian is qualified to sit on the Supreme Court. Will they?

_______________________________________________

Of course they will. Trouble is, there are very few SoCons in DC.

I’m waiting for the RINO’s to join the dems and gush all over her and then confirm her without delay.


9 posted on 05/10/2010 9:46:02 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 - barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

LSD is also illegal...


10 posted on 05/10/2010 9:46:06 AM PDT by Revenge of Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

She wants to get on the Supreme Court lickety-split.


13 posted on 05/10/2010 9:47:23 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (NOVEMBER-2-2010!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

She certainly looks like a muff diver to me, but just as bad, she’s a part of zero’s gang of misfits.


17 posted on 05/10/2010 9:49:54 AM PDT by Frenchtown Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

18 posted on 05/10/2010 9:53:13 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

Some caller had the audacity to ask Suze Orman this question on her talk show, and she answered with amazing truthfulness and matter-of-factness. How come it’s good enough for talk radio but not for the nation’s highest court?


21 posted on 05/10/2010 9:56:55 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

I am sure that attacking her on the Lesbian issue would be very productive.


23 posted on 05/10/2010 9:59:41 AM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
The White House has flatly stated that she is not gay,...

Hey, 0bagger, what's "wrong" with being a Lesbian?

Have you checked with your Paki boyfriend or Sinclare lately?

24 posted on 05/10/2010 9:59:42 AM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

I am sure that attacking her on the Lesbian issue would be very productive.


26 posted on 05/10/2010 10:02:34 AM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
Elena Kagan, if nominated today, will be forced to face the press.

BAAAAaaaaahhhhhhhaaaaaa ...

27 posted on 05/10/2010 10:03:08 AM PDT by dartuser ("Palin 2012 ... nothing else will do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
This woman will be confirmed.

Frankly she is a distraction,while people speculate on her bedroom habits many things will go under the radar.

Its a double win for obama, a lesbian on the court and months of passing legislation, that no one pays attention too.

31 posted on 05/10/2010 10:08:02 AM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
From the article: "The White House has flatly stated that she is not gay ..."

The stupidity of the Obama administration never ceases to amaze me ... they should have realized that they have now made it an acceptable "issue", as it goes to the truthfulness of the WH and the nominee.

Although I respect others who feel differently, and while conceding that "character" is a fair criterion, I couldn't care less who she sleeps with ... I care about her intelligence, knowledge of the law, experience, and a willingness to grapple, in a reasoned way, with issues of huge national importance. She seems to be a knee-jerk liberal with no intellectual curiosity. Anywho who has written so little about the law does not have the passion for the law and for INTELLIGENT argument has no place on the Supreme Court.

35 posted on 05/10/2010 10:10:12 AM PDT by In Maryland ("Impromptu Obamanomics is getting scarier by the day ..." - Caroline Baum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
To quote another FReeper on a similar thread:

"If she isn't a lesbian, it is a terrible waste of ugly."

39 posted on 05/10/2010 10:15:17 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't fly, can't ski, can't drive, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson