[SoCalPol]

Carly Fiorina has been endorsed by the National Right to Life, the California Pro-Life Council, and the Susan B. Anthony List. She is pro-life, pro-traditional marriage,

And a candidate who can win unlike yours.

[Pollster1]

The perfect is the enemy of the good. Getting Fiorina, if she has a good chance to win, is FAR better than getting a perfect conservative who has no potential as a candidate. In many areas we can demand both from a candidate, but we’re talking California. Fiorina is not my favorite or even close, but she’s the best we’re likely to get in CA and far better than six more years of Boxer.

[byteback]

What has Alan Keyes ever won? Some people lead by example and others just run their mouth. He’s no more credible than Jesse Jackson.

[Cicero]

I may be wrong, but I think Fiorina is basically pro-life.

[militanttoby]

If Keyes is your poster boy, boy! Good luck with that EternalVigilance.

What sort of moron attacks one republican in a race when the other likely winner is PRO ABORTION!

[militanttoby]

Maybe you should point out to your buddy that Campbell’s campaign page is proudly pro-abortion. Bit selective in criticism, eh?

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Alan Keyes = the black William Jennings Bryan.

[mockingbyrd]

Alan Keyes has no credibility, his ranting has left him with negative credibility. The fact that he rants again Fiorina is a plus for her.

[onyx]

I didn’t know that the Doctor Senator Tom Coburn has also endorsed Carly Fiorina.

[CounterCounterCulture]

I think Keyes has been reading some of my posts ;-)

I wrote the following on another thread to somebody who was defending Carly's so-called record on abortion (so this was directed to that poster, not to you EV)...

The issue is how serious is Carly Fiorina's pro-life advocacy. I've read how she explained her stance on the matter:
"I myself was not able to have children of my own, and so I know what a precious gift life is," Fiorina said. She helped raised two stepchildren, the daughters of her second husband, Frank Fiorina. One, Lori Ann Fiorina, 35, died last year.

"My husband's mother was told to abort him," Fiorina said. "She spent a year in the hospital after his birth. My husband is the joy of her life, and he is the rock of my life. So those experiences have shaped my view.

That's all well and good as that goes.

But we want to know if she's merely paying us lip service to secure the Republican nomination?

Imagine if a slavery abolitionist such as Frederick Douglass during Antebellum America had stated "while that is a very important issue, it is frankly a decided issue."

Or imagine him saying, “I do not believe where a potential judicial nominee stands on that issue (of slavery) is a qualifier or an unqualifier.”

(the above quotes being Carly's quotes in regard to the abortion issue, modified only to fit the times of Douglass)

It would be ludicrous that an advocate would be so cavalier about the process.

That kind of mere dismissal of the Supreme Court nomination process is part of the problem. You can scoff that something is settled, then the next ruling does something even more atrocious (slavery: Dred Scott ruling; abortion: perhaps the reversal of the partial birth abortion ban)

I would certainly welcome a Constitutional Amendment regarding Personhood of the preborn, as is being attempted in some states right now. In the meantime, this current Supreme Court or the subsequent one once Obama gets his future nominee cleared, can continue to thwart states' attempts.

Those who give a pass to leftist jurors (and it's not just abortion they are wrong on) are not doing us any favors. If Carly's merely quipping it's a "decided issue" or a "theoretical issue," she is not an advocate for the pro-life movement, and the so-called pro-life groups that endorsed her ought to be ashamed.