1 posted on
05/07/2010 5:17:56 PM PDT by
NCjim
To: NCjim
with the new 96 weeks of unemployment pay I intend on retiring at 63 and drawing unemployment for the last two years before my ss kicks in.
2 posted on
05/07/2010 5:20:51 PM PDT by
guitarplayer1953
(Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to GOD! Thomas Jefferson)
To: NCjim
one in six men who are 25 to 54 will not be working," Lawrence Summers, the president's economic adviser, said the other day.I hope those are the ones that voted for "hope and change"
3 posted on
05/07/2010 5:21:09 PM PDT by
2aberro
To: NCjim
One of every five men 25 to 54 isn't working.What is the ratio of want to work/refuse to work males between 25 and 54 is?
5 posted on
05/07/2010 5:24:58 PM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: NCjim
I've been unemployable my entire life. Tried working for someone else once. Yikes! Thank you high school economics teacher that pointed out, if you are working for someone else, that is exactly what you are doing. Much better to work for yourself if you can manage yourself.
I've pulled out the self-butt-kicker a few times. Better me giving myself a kick over a mistake than getting the boot from someone else.
To: NCjim
Maybe he just wants men to go back to school and get a competitive edge....or not.
To: NCjim
OK. 17% unemployment for prime working years is acceptable to Presidential advisors and administrative policies?
Good to know.
9 posted on
05/07/2010 5:31:49 PM PDT by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
To: NCjim; cripplecreek; Tijeras_Slim
Meet the Unemployable Man
__________
****
12 posted on
05/07/2010 5:35:33 PM PDT by
ICAB9USA
(I cut off part of my middle finger .......... it almost rendered me mute. -- Rahm Emanuel)
To: NCjim
I’m not sure I believe this.
I was in college studying business when Carter was in. They were saying the same things, that we had to get used to double digit unemployment, the new norm, the new Laffer curve etc.
I’ve always looked back on that as socialism setting low expectations of the economy so people wouldn’t be angry and shocked when the bad situation rolled on years without end because of liberal policies and agendas.
Fortunately the people didn’t buy it and voted in Reagan.
13 posted on
05/07/2010 5:35:59 PM PDT by
I still care
(I believe in the universality of freedom -George Bush, asked if he regrets going to war.)
To: NCjim
ALL THE MORE REASON TO BOOT ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS OUT OF THE UNITED STATES.
To: NCjim
If I were some mealy-mouthed incumbent politician or smug political insider and I read that it was likely that an army of 10s of millions of men in their prime were going to be unemployed for the next 5 years based largely on the crap done by government over the past several years, I would be scared shitless.
19 posted on
05/07/2010 6:00:05 PM PDT by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: NCjim
Isn’t this the goal of the left?
To: NCjim
Unemployable man
To: NCjim
Sidelining a huge part of an entire generation of men would waste human potential, create economic misery for their families
and fuel political discontent.
Notice how they added that little tidbit at the very end....
Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson