To: verity
1. Using the word 'plots' is unusual. 2. By 2025, this Country may find the aircraft unaffordable.
It'll be affordable if we actually want to build it. I know some folks working on the F-35, and the reason it has cost problems is because (once again) its electronics and software systems are an order of magnitude more complex than the F-22, which in turn were the most complex we'd ever put in a fighter, etc., etc.
IMHO, the question is whether we should be spending a decade or more on systems engineering for a single multi-role platform or just make multiple, simpler platforms.
11 posted on
05/07/2010 6:04:37 AM PDT by
BikerJoe
To: BikerJoe
we could also design it so the electronics could be easily upgraded, but that would make too much sense, I guess...
18 posted on
05/07/2010 7:39:06 AM PDT by
stefanbatory
(Weed out the RINOs! Sign the pledge. conservativepledge.org)
To: BikerJoe
"...or just make multiple, simpler platforms..."
Do you know is this was ever proposed? If so, I suspect the "multi-role" proponents have much more influence.
24 posted on
05/07/2010 11:00:10 AM PDT by
verity
(Obama Lies - Obongo must go!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson