Now, if it was porn of a woman AND a dog, that would be news.
The most salient fact is that the Senate was debating *abortion*, and this guy wasn’t paying attention because he was “bored.” Thanks for ignoring your JOB, Mr. Salary-Paid-By-The-Citizens Senator.
>> The most salient fact is that the Senate was debating *abortion*, and this guy wasn’t paying attention because he was “bored.” Thanks for ignoring your JOB, Mr. Salary-Paid-By-The-Citizens Senator.
In fairness ... Senate ‘debate’ is an exercise in attention-grabbing, not an actual debate. I’d be extremely disappointed in a Republican Senator that needed to listen to debate to figure out his opinion on abortion laws.
Also ... it was a non-sexual picture of a couple of topless women, not “porn”. Clearly a lapse in judgment, but hardly a high crime.
SnakeDoc