[Tublecane]

“What is your reasoning for that interpretation?”

Well, illegals are subject to U.S. laws, for one. No one denies that, do they? Furthermore, they don’t fall into any of the categories traditionally associated with not being subject to U.S. jurisdiction, namely diplomats, members of hostile occupying forces, and Native Americans.

[TigersEye]

All of those people are subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. regardless of any qualifying statutes. The very immunity from certain laws that they enjoy exists due to U.S. jurisdiction does it not? The interpretation you are using doesn't hold water.