Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

OK, here is what I found on a very quick search:

In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person becomes a citizen of the United States at the time of birth, by virtue of the first clause of the 14th amendment of the Constitution, if that person is:

Born in the United States

Has parents that are subjects of a foreign power, but not in any diplomatic or official capacity of that foreign power

Has parents that have permanent domicile and residence in the United States

Has parents that are in the United States for business


I apologize for thinking it was in the constitution. I’ve read the damn thing so many times, you’d think I would have known it wasn’t addressed directly. I wonder why it isn’t? It seems like something they would have thought about before talking about everything else. Sort of, “here’s who can be in the club” before defining the club rules.

I stand corrected and humbled once more....


43 posted on 04/28/2010 10:15:39 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (This nation, of the people, by the people, and for the people has perished from the land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

I researched this a few years ago I think if you do a search on it you will find President Clinton signed a law in 95 or 96 that did away with precedent the children are returned with the parents so no one can claim precedent as he did this in 95 or 96 google it.


109 posted on 04/28/2010 4:07:06 PM PDT by Lees Swrd ("Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe and preserve order in the world as well")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson