Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leonard210

“The group of archaeologists ruled out an established human settlement, explaining one had never been found above 11,500 feet in the vicinity.”

Until today.

That statement contains the WORST logic I’ve ever heard. No Ark had ever previously been found in the vicinity EITHER. So, by their own logical constructs, it’s not an Ark either.

Do you see?


27 posted on 04/27/2010 10:10:15 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: bolobaby

LOL. I thought the same thing.


54 posted on 04/27/2010 11:08:12 AM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: bolobaby

“’The group of archaeologists ruled out an established human settlement, explaining one had never been found above 11,500 feet in the vicinity.’

Until today.”

Got it. It is a previously unknown “settlement” at 13,000 feet with large hewn lumber and mortised joints. Still worthy of more than a flip response.


68 posted on 04/27/2010 12:38:03 PM PDT by Leonard210 (Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson