I disagree withe 3A of your statement. She was never called Natural Born. Naturalized, I can understand, her father deferred citizenship to her by virture of naturalization one year before her birth. The fact that he denounced his citizenship after her birth, does not remove her dual citizenship right, unless she renounces her citizenship personally after the age of consent. which she did not do.
Obama is a whole nuther kettle of fish. His father was never a US citizen. We have no evidence of where he was born, and it is not forthcoming. His mother, a US citizen, was not in the US long enough before Obamas birth to defer citizenship either.
In the end, Obama’s father is not a US Citizen, and never became one Before obamas birth or at any time in his life.
Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen, and until evidence is provided, has not even proven he is a naturalized citizen IMO.
This sentence doesn't make sense. She was never naturalized (and her father's US citizenship status is immaterial) because she was born on US soil. She acquired US citizenship through jus soli, or so was held in Ark.
As for native born vs. natural-born, Elk uses these two statements interchangeably and in the dicta of the decision, the majority opinion makes mention of the fact that they're interchangeable phrases. I would cut & paste that particular line, but I'm on a iPhone and it's just too darn hard. But, if you read the entire decision, it's in there.