Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Suggests Value-Added Tax May Be An Option [Obama Bombshell?]
AP Report ^ | April 21st 2010 | Charles Babington

Posted on 04/21/2010 9:40:47 PM PDT by Steelfish

Obama Suggests Value-Added Tax May Be An Option

By CHARLES BABINGTON Apr 21

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama suggested Wednesday that a new value-added tax on Americans is still on the table, seeming to show more openness to the idea than his aides have expressed in recent days. Before deciding what revenue options are best for dealing with the deficit and the economy, Obama said in an interview with CNBC, "I want to get a better picture of what our options are."

After Obama adviser Paul Volcker recently raised the prospect of a value-added tax, or VAT, the Senate voted 85-13 last week for a nonbinding "sense of the Senate" resolution that calls the such a tax "a massive tax increase that will cripple families on fixed income and only further push back America's economic recovery." For days, White House spokesmen have said the president has not proposed and is not considering a VAT.

"I think I directly answered this the other day by saying that it wasn't something that the president had under consideration," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters shortly before Obama spoke with CNBC. After the interview, White House deputy communications director Jen Psaki said nothing has changed and the White House is "not considering" a VAT.

Many European countries impose a VAT, which taxes the value that is added at each stage of production of certain commodities. It could apply, for instance, to raw products delivered to a mill, the mill's production work and so on up the line to the retailer. In the CNBC interview, Obama said he was waiting for recommendations from a bipartisan fiscal advisory commission on ways to tackle the deficit and other problems.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda; bho44; bhotaxincrease; vat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
When asked if he could see a potential VAT in this nation, the president said: "I know that there's been a lot of talk around town lately about the value-added tax. That is something that has worked for some countries. It's something that would be novel for the United States." "And before, you know, I start saying 'this makes sense or that makes sense,' I want to get a better picture of what our options are," Obama said.
1 posted on 04/21/2010 9:40:47 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

BOHICA, ladies and gents.


2 posted on 04/21/2010 9:42:35 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Oh crap! Does this mean we have to thank him again like that dork in California did?


3 posted on 04/21/2010 9:45:56 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

vat is not good...how about fair tax and no irs?


4 posted on 04/21/2010 9:46:07 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Make no mistake - this is a tax on the poor!


5 posted on 04/21/2010 9:46:41 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Well, if the Euros do it it must be the cat’s meow!!!!!!!


6 posted on 04/21/2010 9:46:50 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

We all know that tax increases are coming. Obama has appointed this phony commission to make recommendations on how to reduce the deficit and national debt. The idea is to shift the hard decisions to some outside board, similar to base closings, so the Congress can avoid the responsibility and consequences for making hard decisions. The commission will recommend tax hikes and the MSM will aid the WH by supporting them explaining how much of a financial crisis this country is in.


7 posted on 04/21/2010 9:48:21 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

If the Dems push this through before November, there will be a 400 Republicans - 35 Dems Congress in January of 2011. Another Bill for the Pubbies to repeal.


8 posted on 04/21/2010 9:51:32 PM PDT by no dems (Palin / Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Yeah, just don’t call the Pres-ent a Socialist. Because he’s not one. /sarc


9 posted on 04/21/2010 9:51:38 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar

I am sure Obama will redistribute wealth to give VAT subsidies to the poor minorities. Poor whites are screwed.


10 posted on 04/21/2010 9:54:16 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kabar

They need to cut spending...cut, cut, cut. Here are some ideal..., stop all foreign aide, pull all the troops overseas home..tell these countries you are on your own..we pay for those bases overseas. We can’t afford it anymore.


11 posted on 04/21/2010 9:55:22 PM PDT by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

If you go to msn.com their news headline is “Middle-class taxes not in Obama deficit plan”. When you click on this link it goes to a story about Obama considering the VAT. Is MSNBC so confident that most of their readers are only going to read the propaganda headline and not the story that clearly is a contradiction?


12 posted on 04/21/2010 9:58:49 PM PDT by willk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Could He be that blatant?
13 posted on 04/21/2010 9:59:55 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar

Yes. He already altered his no increase in taxes claims, to “no increase in income taxes” to cover for other taxes.

He now claims he only said there’d be no increase in income taxes for those making less than 200/250K.


14 posted on 04/21/2010 10:03:30 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar

He’s been that blatant already, why quit now?

Joe the Plumber - spreadin’ the wealth around is a good thing, ya know?


15 posted on 04/21/2010 10:04:11 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass
The problem is that more than 50% of our spending is for the entitlement programs and the interest to service our national debt. Foreign aid makes up less than half a percent of our national budget. Pulling our troops home will not reduce costs that much. Many of the countries they are stationed in pay part of the costs. And we do have national security interests around the globe that need defending. We have reduced our forces in Europe down to 80,000 from the 500,000 we had during the Cold War.

By 2060, the entitlement programs will consume over 70% of the federal budget. By 2030, one in five Americans will be 65 or older, twice what it is today. In 1950 we had 16 workers for every retiree; today it is 3.3, and by 2030 it will be two. We cannot sustain SS and Medicare as currently structured. They represent an unfunded liability of $60 trillion. We have 60 million people on Medicaid and Obamacare will add another 16 million.

You are right. We can't afford many things any more. The entitlement programs need to be cut, cut, cut. We have some very painful decisions ahead as a nation. We have lived beyond our means for decades. We are bankrupt.

16 posted on 04/21/2010 10:06:29 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
He now claims he only said there’d be no increase in income taxes for those making less than 200/250K.

The health care reform law broke this promise. Bigtime.

17 posted on 04/21/2010 10:17:29 PM PDT by freespirited (I'm against a homogenized society because I want the cream to rise. --Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kabar

The unfunded liabilities with SS and Medicare is over 100 trillion.


18 posted on 04/21/2010 10:17:52 PM PDT by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

The $60 trillion is over a 75 year period. And yes it is over $100 trillion if you go beyond that period.


19 posted on 04/21/2010 10:28:39 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar

Not when the poor get massive tax credits for taxes they never paid.


20 posted on 04/21/2010 10:34:46 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson