Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House effort would legalize, tax online gambling
mcclatchydc.com ^ | April 21, 2010 | Michael Beller

Posted on 04/21/2010 1:40:03 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

WASHINGTON — Americans looking to satisfy their gambling itch can do so now at the close to 1,700 casinos across the country. A bill in the House of Representatives could bring casino gambling to the approximately 86.8 million American homes with Internet access.

Reps. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Jim McDermott, D-Wash., are leading a group that proposes to repeal the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, which is set to go into effect June 1. Their plan would legalize and tax online gambling.

"We have an activity going on illegally in this country and we're pretending it doesn't exist," McDermott said. Internet gambling "people have said 'We want to be legal and we're certainly willing to pay taxes,' and we need the money. On every count, this is a net positive."

The bill calls for a 6 percent tax on all deposits to be paid to state and tribal governments made by residents of their jurisdiction. For example, if someone living in Missouri puts $1,000 into an online gambling account anywhere in the country, $60 would go to Missouri's state government.

Additionally, 2 percent of all deposits would go to the federal government. The congressional Joint Committee on Taxation estimated the bill would generate $30 billion for state and tribal governments and $42 billion for the federal government over the next 10 years.

"This is a huge boon to the state governments," McDermott said. "If you look across the country you're seeing programs cut. In Arizona, they just cut out a program for children's health for 40,000 kids. Here's a source of money" to keep that going.

Along with much-needed funds, Frank made a libertarian argument supporting new legislation.

"American adults want to be able to do what they want with their own money without the government interfering," Frank said.

(Excerpt) Read more at mcclatchydc.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/21/2010 1:40:03 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Guys this is a FEDERAL SALES TAX or VAT..

6% to States.. 2% to Feds...


2 posted on 04/21/2010 1:44:37 PM PDT by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Maybe more people will show up in Vegas if they start taxing internet gambling... LOL!;)


3 posted on 04/21/2010 1:44:46 PM PDT by BossLady (<----Butler Alumnus - proud of my Dawgs!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Another tax for the lower classes...


4 posted on 04/21/2010 1:44:52 PM PDT by JohnLongIsland ( schmuckie schucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Gee, maybe they’ll also allow us to run up gambling debts on our credit cards. Maybe Obama will force the banks not to deny online gambling debts, just like with home mortgages.


5 posted on 04/21/2010 1:44:57 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
""American adults want to be able to do what they want with their own money without the government interfering," Frank said."

Wow! The depths of arrogant hypocrisy knows no bounds with these people.

6 posted on 04/21/2010 1:47:02 PM PDT by Seruzawa (If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
I do this stuff legally with the State of NJ. (Fortunately, I only have made an initial deposit!) NJ takes the pari-mutual bets and already collects a tax on them (just like any other race track bet). If they decide to move beyond the already existing taxes, I will seriously consider the off-shore sites beyond Barney Frank's reach.

ML/NJ

7 posted on 04/21/2010 1:50:33 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY; Revolting cat!
"We have an activity going on illegally in this country and we're pretending it doesn't exist," McDermott said. Internet gambling "people have said 'We want to be legal and we're certainly willing to pay taxes,' and we need the money. On every count, this is a net positive."

When is the homebusiness run whorehouse law coming through then, Barney Frank? People want to be legal and paying their taxes, don't they?

8 posted on 04/21/2010 1:53:51 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (We've gone from phony soldiers to phony conservative protesters. Nothing about liberalism is genuine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss

Maybe we wouldn’t have Bawny Fag pushing a stealth tax disguised as a legalization of a vice if our guys hadn’t been so obsessed with criminalizing vices when they had the majority. Instead of taking principled stands on things such as SS reform, drilling in ANWR, and reining in Fannie and Freddie, they obsessed about online gambling, MLB steroid hearings, and Janet Jackson’s areola. No wonder Pelosi and Reid waltzed into the House and Senate leadership in 2006.


9 posted on 04/21/2010 1:56:01 PM PDT by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

“American adults want to be able to do what they want with their own money without the government interfering”


As long as they don’t buy salty foods or incandescent light bulbs.


10 posted on 04/21/2010 1:58:24 PM PDT by married21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

which will pre-empt and take away business from all the Casinos that just set up shop here in Pennsylvania and were supposed to be the end to all our budget worries. (I kinda want to see a fist fight between Ed Rendell and Barney Frank over this....ooops....guess I can’t use the word “fist” where Frank is concerned....)


11 posted on 04/21/2010 2:08:22 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
I will seriously consider the off-shore sites beyond Barney Frank's reach.

Offshore doesn't stop the feds anymore. What's needed is open source software something like encrypted e-mail but where each message is broken into blocks and stored in P2P servers such that it requires keys, maps, and many layers and remote unwrapping steps to access and assemble the data. No one knows who anyone is and can't find out. The initial killer app would be sports betting using an untraceable virtual currency. As internet speed improves it could grow into an entire tax-free underground economy with virtual web servers that no government could shut down without shutting down all forms of communication. The Italian mafia in NJ could get the First Virtual Bank of Sicily going and make a bundle.

12 posted on 04/21/2010 2:42:52 PM PDT by Reeses (All is vanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
Offshore doesn't stop the feds anymore.

Not sure that's true. As long as one can use a foreign computer, he can use that machine as if he were sitting there.

ML/NJ

13 posted on 04/21/2010 3:30:26 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
Long time hold-out Switzerland folds

The bank admitted that between 2000 and 2007 as many as 50 of its bankers traveled to this country from Switzerland every few months. None of them, including Birkenfeld, a U.S. citizen, was licensed to transact business in this country. They came with encrypted computers and met with each client to service accounts.

The bank even trained its bankers in avoiding detection by U.S. regulators.

UBS agreed to pay a $780 million fine, closed down its cross-border U.S. business and subsequently promised in a deal with Attorney General Eric Holder to turn over the names of 4,500 of some 19,000 American clients.

We need a virtual bank that can't be shut down and that can't turn in their customers because because they don't know who they are.

14 posted on 04/21/2010 5:37:36 PM PDT by Reeses (All is vanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson