Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz

No, but Sherman was a war criminal.


19 posted on 04/11/2010 11:30:57 AM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Oceander
No, but Sherman was a war criminal.

Really? For wanting to inflict on CSA conditions so bad as to bring the War to a swift conclusion?

29 posted on 04/11/2010 11:36:06 AM PDT by gundog (Outrage is anger taken by surprise. Nothing these people do surprises me anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Oceander

“No, but Sherman was a war criminal.”
I think Mr. Peabody bears the ultimate responsibility.


50 posted on 04/11/2010 12:11:16 PM PDT by Carl LaFong (Experts say experts should be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Oceander

He was. Of course, the Lincoln fans will criticize you for saying that but it doesn’t make it any less true.


87 posted on 04/11/2010 4:36:08 PM PDT by AzaleaCity5691
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Oceander
No, but Sherman was a war criminal.

I see you and Roland have a lot in common.

117 posted on 04/12/2010 4:06:36 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson