Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Organs 'Removed For Transplant Without Consent' [Wishes of 800,000 "Wrongly Recorded"]
BBCNews ^ | April 10th 2010

Posted on 04/10/2010 6:35:23 PM PDT by Steelfish

Organs 'Removed For Transplant Without Consent'

It is illegal to take organs without consent. Organs may have been removed from deceased people without their consent after a data-handling error by the NHS. The blunder meant 800,000 people on the UK donor register had their wishes about the use of organs for transplant after death wrongly recorded. The Sunday Telegraph reported that 45 of them have now died - and 20 families let organs of relatives be taken based on incorrectly stored information.

NHS Blood and Transplant said it was urgently investigating. Many donors give consent for some organs to be used for transplant but not others, such as eyes. But the details of many donors' preferences were accidentally deleted in 1999. It is horrific that such sensitive details were handled in such a careless way Patient Concern. It first came to light in 2009 when NHS Blood and Transplant wrote to donors, reiterating what they had agreed to donate. But many wrote back saying the information was incorrect.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: healthcare; medicaldatabase; medicalrecords; organdonation
So what do you expect? Well, at the NHS they don't speak and understand English anymore.
1 posted on 04/10/2010 6:35:23 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
The Liberals Democrats believe in reforms to provide for assumed consent so as to increase organs available for transplant.

Assumed consent, huh?

2 posted on 04/10/2010 6:45:46 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

In before the Monty Python skit link.


3 posted on 04/10/2010 6:50:08 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Steelfish

I refuse to be a donor. Whenever I have to submit for a medical procedure, I make it clear they are to treat me as a living patient, not a potential farm to be “harvested’ and sent to a human chop-shop.


5 posted on 04/10/2010 7:02:29 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrPR
Why don’t you find it yourself and post it?

Oh all right.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aclS1pGHp8o

6 posted on 04/10/2010 7:11:01 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Seniors are only good for Soylent Green anyway.


7 posted on 04/10/2010 7:13:38 PM PDT by barb-tex (Obama Care ls spending part of the Half trillion on Logans Merry-Go-Round)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: barb-tex

I had a very different attitude about that....until I grew old enough to be peat moss.


8 posted on 04/10/2010 7:22:21 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I wonder when some moonbat (British or otherwise) will call for mandatory organ donation laws? As far-fetched as it sounds, I can honestly see there being those who would latch on to it on the premise that it would be for the “public good.”

Scary thought, but there’s a lot of scary stuff these days...


9 posted on 04/10/2010 7:42:33 PM PDT by DemforBush (Somebody wake me when sanity has returned to the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Organs may have been removed from deceased people without their consent after a data-handling error by the NHS...can't wait for all of our medical records to become available on-line....
10 posted on 04/10/2010 9:07:11 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Well, you gotta admit it is ‘green’ since it involves recycling. Also, I don’t think it was a mistake - it would help generate a lot of revenue to the medical industry so it was probably done intentionally and was already planned to be called a ‘mistake’ or ‘glitch’ upon discovery.


11 posted on 04/11/2010 5:26:19 AM PDT by KIDFOH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson