Skip to comments.
3rd Circuit picks June 29 for eligibility case
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| April 08, 2010
| Bob Unruh
Posted on 04/08/2010 7:00:00 PM PDT by Man50D
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: hiho hiho
21
posted on
04/08/2010 7:57:37 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: Frantzie; katiekins1
22
posted on
04/08/2010 8:03:18 PM PDT
by
seekthetruth
(Vote Ed Lynch FL -19; Dan Fanelli FL - 8 ; Allen West FL - 22! Erick Forcade FL -10)
To: TheConservativeParty; rxsid; Seizethecarp
23
posted on
04/08/2010 8:03:59 PM PDT
by
circumbendibus
(Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2010)
To: Man50D
24
posted on
04/08/2010 8:08:46 PM PDT
by
JDoutrider
(PLEASE HELP FREEPER JEFF HEAD: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2481989/posts)
To: pissant
25
posted on
04/08/2010 8:12:08 PM PDT
by
PhiloBedo
(I won't be happy until Jet-A is less than $2.00 a gallon)
To: jamese777
The Supreme Court refused each of those cases because they are not a Trier of Fact. They are a Judicial Review Court....ie they do not hear testimony arguing facts, they listen to arguements about points of law and how they are correctly applied to the case at hand....When a case is tried in one of the lower courts, the USSC will then take up the matter upon someone’s appeal and we will get a Constitutional ruling....not until then....I have full confidence that eventually it will reach our highest Court..... and Obama will be out on his ear!
To: Frantzie
Mario was talking about Ramsay last night and he added it to the case plus he has a good handle on it.Excellent! Godspeed to them.
27
posted on
04/08/2010 8:25:34 PM PDT
by
bgill
(The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
To: ASA Vet
THANKS for all the PINGS! So many new & interesting developments. My guess is there is a bit less sleep going on in the People's House these day, lol.
28
posted on
04/08/2010 8:31:30 PM PDT
by
patlin
(1st SCOTUS of USA: "Human life, from its commencement to its close, is protected by the common law.")
To: little jeremiah; All
To: Man50D
OH!! The bloody horse head in the bed ploy, aye?
To: LucyT
Sure hope they don’t change the date.
31
posted on
04/08/2010 9:01:38 PM PDT
by
azishot
(J.D. Hayworth...U.S. Senator FOR Arizona...http://www.jdforsenate.com/)
To: Red Steel
32
posted on
04/08/2010 9:02:51 PM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(I don't care what you passed. you are irrelevant. I'll NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
To: LucyT
I only wish they wouldn’t pick those particular examples to publish when it comes to Obama via Kerchner. I don’t know if it’s selective or not, but Obama has DEFINITELY affected ALL US Citizens via Obamacare and other Unconstitutional Laws he has signed that directly effect the entire country, as well as now executive orders that are illegal (calling for the assassination of a US citizen by the CIA — excuse me??? No trial???).
VERY GLAD that this will be heard by the appeals court. And I’m VERY GLAD that they are basing a lot on Obama’s British Citizenship, even IF his mother was qualified to bestow citizenship on Obama as the time he is STILL not a “natural born citizen” due to his at the very LEAST Dual Citizenship with Britain and the US!
33
posted on
04/08/2010 9:16:02 PM PDT
by
LibertyRocks
(http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
To: mojitojoe
YES! Noticed the words about the case that says "listed on the merits"...that can be held "within the week of June 28th" which includes the 4th of July, U.S. Independence Day.
I find the timing a little more than interesting. Prophetic?
To: Man50D
35
posted on
04/08/2010 9:31:28 PM PDT
by
Dajjal
(Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
To: hiho hiho
Yes, but that was before 0s performance at the State of the Union address. Yep. Roger that...
36
posted on
04/08/2010 9:33:29 PM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: Man50D
3rd Circuit picks June 29 for eligibility case Does anyone know the of reputation of this court? Past rulings?
To: Man50D
Judge Carter (of Santa Ana, CA) replied to one of the Taitz filings that the proper venue for the inquiry was a “Quo Warranto” hearing in the D.C. District Court. Why wouldn’t that apply here?
To: Irish Eyes
39
posted on
04/09/2010 1:44:57 AM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
To: Man50D
40
posted on
04/09/2010 2:45:41 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson