Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCFRoadWarrior
Not only that....Murdoch got his start in the Aussie newspaper business by supporting Labour Party candidates.

Not really. He got his start in the newspaper business by inheriting his father's, Sir Keith Murdoch's, already fairly substantial media holdings, and most of his early career (from 1953-1964) was spent supporting the conservative government of Sir Robert Menzies. He then transferred his support to the minor, if anything more conservative, party in the conservative coalition - the Country Party under Black Jack McEwan (from 1964-1972).

He did support Gough Whitlam and the Labor Party in the 1972 election, but abandoned that support before the end of 1974.

In the UK, he supported Thatcher in the 1980s.

He is, as you say, an opportunist - he'll switch sides to anybody who gives him what he wants. But throughout his career, he has tended more to the right than the left, whether because of some actual convictions or just because that's the way it happens to have worked out, I couldn't say. But it's not very accurate to suggest he supported Labor early on. At that time, conservatism was definitely in the ascendancy in Australia (23 years of consecutive conservative rule) and he was playing that game.

4 posted on 04/07/2010 11:20:44 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: naturalman1975
Rupert Murdoch or 'The Dirty Digger' as he is known here in Britain, is a man who purposely twists the truth to suit his own agenda. I still haven't forgiven him for the abomination that is Peter Weir's Gallipoli which he apparently influenced to make it as anti-British as possible, by making out that all British officers were effete degenerates and that it was a British Colonel who sent the light horsemen uselessly to their deaths to support a British force that was 'drinking tea' in Suvla Bay, when in fact the Colonel was Australian (J.M. Antill) and the British suffered more in casualties alone (74,000) at Gallipoli than there were total number of Australian ANZACs (><60,000) who fought there...
5 posted on 04/08/2010 3:14:00 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson