To: rmlew
Were she a true social issues conservative, she would not have run for governor and then VP with small children.Hmmm. . .I guess that depends on what you define as "social issues conservative". I wouldn't say that being a governor or VP disqualifies a woman from being a social conservative. Apparently you do.
6 posted on
04/07/2010 1:40:25 PM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: MEGoody
A womane with small children should raise her kids. As Bristol shows, Palin could not do so.
I have nothing against women with adult children running.
18 posted on
04/07/2010 1:47:55 PM PDT by
rmlew
(There is no such thing as a Blue Dog Democrat; just liberals who lie.)
To: MEGoody
But she is a feminist who supports Title IX and other NEA-like equality laws.
Now I was a product of Title IX, where legislation allowed that equal opportunity, she said. Now if we have to still keep going down that road to create more legislation to get with it in the 21st century to make sure that women do have equality, especially in the workplace, then were there.
156 posted on
04/07/2010 3:31:53 PM PDT by
ari-freedom
(Yammoto:I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson