Waiting from you Freepers to chime in on this.
Hoping someone here can explain the trade-offs on this from a FR perspective.
I don’t want to try to sort this all out from a MSM news perspective. I just don’t have the time.
What is the bottom line on this?
Any parallels to the Tennessee Valley Authority mess from the 1930’s?
I live on the Internet now, so this is important to me.
Thanks
Jeff
well, from what I have read, net neutrality is what we have now.
without it, ISPs would be able to decide what websites they want to allow. Your web provider could block freerepublic, for example.
It means no one can tell you to drink Coke when you prefer Pepsi.
No one tell what you can put on your website and service providers can’t start favoring traffic to other sites or limiting traffic to your site or your favorite site such as Free Republic.