Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll

Well at least you are now better informed that both Fukino and Lingle DID in fact declare Obama to be born in Hawaii. That’s more accurate than when you were denying those facts.

The Director of the Department of Health doesn’t work for the Attorney General so why would they need to substantiate her statement? The Department of Health is one agency of the Hawaii state government and the Attorney General’s office is another. I will note however that the Attorney General in Hawaii, Mark L. Bennnett is a Republican and he has independent subpoena power under Hawaii law. That means that he could issue a subpoena for Obama’s original birth records if he wanted to. Obviously he hasn’t done that.

Don’t try to kill the messenger. I’m reporting the facts as I understand them. When Obama’s opponents proceed on the basis of rumor and misinformation, it ultimately benefits Obama. “If you hit the King, you’d better kill him.”

It is an indisputable fact that since Dr. Fukino’s ORIGINAL statement issued in October of 2008, no court including the US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of any plaintiff that has challenged Obama.

Now if you want “bending over backwards” the Attorney General of Indiana who is a Republican defended Obama’s citizenship in the case of “Ankeny v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels” which was attempting to invalidate Obama’s electoral votes on the grounds that he is not eligible. The Indiana Court of Appeals found that he is eligible and dismissed the lawsuit.


63 posted on 03/24/2010 12:56:00 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: jamese777

“Well at least you are now better informed that both Fukino and Lingle DID in fact declare Obama to be born in Hawaii.”

How cute and catty you are, avoiding the subject of Obama’s use of that 999 prefix SSN. As a Federal record it puts a lie to everything you’ve just written.

As for the courts, I haven’t brought them up for a reason: one cannot remove a usurper from a national political office except through Quo Warranto, and that is done through the District Court of Washington, D.C. People who are frustrated, who know he isn’t eligible to be in the White House, are ignorant about how it should be done.

Only the Congress of the United States of America is allowed, by the Constitution, to remove the President from office. High crimes and misdemeanors are handled by the Congress directly but in the case of a usurper, Congress delegated its authority to the District Court of Washington, D.C. There, a person with standing can file a lawsuit against a sitting President and force him/her to prove eligibility.

But Obama’s day is coming. There were 789 Chrysler dealers who lost their livelihood because of Obama. They have been grievously harmed and definitely have standing.

Now, Jamese777, keep that SSN 999-XX-XXXX in mind. Truth is the daughter of time.


66 posted on 03/24/2010 1:21:08 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson