Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919
"failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted."

I understand that's the court's cop out. And it's true, the court couldn't order the removal of the President. The most the court could do provide fact finding and a referal to congress.

But I don't think that warrants sanctions, either.

34 posted on 03/23/2010 1:36:42 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN

I understand that’s the court’s cop out. And it’s true, the court couldn’t order the removal of the President. The most the court could do provide fact finding and a referal to congress.

But I don’t think that warrants sanctions, either.


The Courts don’t provide “referrals to Congress” either. Congress can undertake its own independent investigation any time that it wants to and Congress COULD have delayed the certification of Obama’s Electoral votes if any two members of Congress had been willing to file written objections to his electoral votes being certified. No two members (one Senator and one Congressman were needed) submitted a written objection.


35 posted on 03/23/2010 2:12:13 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson