Posted on 03/22/2010 2:42:42 PM PDT by Rational Thought
For as long as the political fight took over the past year, the abbreviated review process on the health care legislation currently pending on President Obamas desk is unquestionably going to result in some surprises as happens with any piece of mashed-up legislation both for the congressmen who voted for it and for the American people.
One such surprise is found on page 158 of the legislation, which appears to create a carveout for senior staff members in the leadership offices and on congressional committees, essentially exempting those senior Democrat staffers who wrote the bill from being forced to purchase health care plans in the same way as other Americans.
A major story during the course of the health care debate was whether members of Congress would commit to placing themselves in the same health care exchanges as average citizens, or whether they would hang on to their government plans thats why leadership chose to add this portion to the bill, serving as a guarantee that members would participate in the same health plans as the people. Heres the relevant text:
(D) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS IN THE EXCHANGE-
(i) REQUIREMENT- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after the effective date of this subtitle, the only health plans that the Federal Government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff with respect to their service as a Member of Congress or congressional staff shall be health plans that are
(I) created under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act); or
(II) offered through an Exchange established under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act).
But as with a lot of legislative matters, the devil is in the details or in this case, the definitions. As anyone whos worked on Capitol Hill knows, the personal office staff for a member is governed by different rules than those who work on committees and in the leadership offices. It appears from the way this language is written that those staffers NOT in personal offices, such as those working and paid under the committee structure (such as those working for Chairman Henry Waxman) or those working on leadership staff (such as those working for Speaker Nancy Pelosi) would be exempt from these requirements (emphasis added).
(ii) DEFINITIONS- In this section:
(I) MEMBER OF CONGRESS- The term `Member of Congress means any member of the House of Representatives or the Senate.
(II) CONGRESSIONAL STAFF- The term `congressional staff means all full-time and part-time employees employed by the official office of a Member of Congress, whether in Washington, DC or outside of Washington, DC.
According to the Congressional Research Service, this definition of staff will only apply to those staffers employed within a members personal office meaning that it will absolutely not apply to committee staff members, and may not apply to leadership staff.
This problem was acknowledged earlier in the process last year, Senator Grassley tried to repair it, but he was rebuffed.
"As Speaker Pelosi said a few weeks ago, its only after this legislation is passed that well truly find out whats in it."
Gambling? Here in River City? I’m stunned!
If the gop all refuse this option and take the one just passed they will hit a grandslam with the public
Equal protection under the law? I think not. Some pigs are more equal than others.
I thought this option was the one just passed. I’m confused.
ROTFLMAO
Serves them right. Senators and Representatives of the House and their personal staff MUST participate in the same way as required of us.
However, staff of committees (in all probability, those who actually wrote the bill) are EXEMPT.
BWAAAHAAHAAHAA
Uh, what are staffers writing these bills that will totally ruin our lives?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.