Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When health care bill's provisions would take effect
mcclatchy ^ | 3/22/10 | David Lightman

Posted on 03/22/2010 2:28:02 PM PDT by Nachum

WASHINGTON — Here are the effective dates of major provisions of the health care overhaul legislation approved Sunday:

WITHIN A YEAR

- Would provide a $250 rebate this year to Medicare prescription drug beneficiaries whose initial benefits run out.

90 days after enactment:

- Would provide immediate access to high-risk pools for people with no insurance because of pre-existing conditions.

Six months after enactment:

- Would bar insurers from denying people coverage when they get sick.

- Would bar insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions.

- Would bar insurers from imposing lifetime caps on coverage.

- Would require insurers to allow people to stay on their parents' policies until they turn 26

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/03/21/90794/when-health-care-bills-provisions.html#ixzz0iwXYH3Pi

(Excerpt) Read more at mcclatchydc.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bills; care; health; provisions

1 posted on 03/22/2010 2:28:03 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What is it with Democrats and 26 year old “children”?


2 posted on 03/22/2010 2:30:11 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

The kids live in their parents’ basements until at least 40.


3 posted on 03/22/2010 2:31:58 PM PDT by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Would bar insurers from denying people coverage when they get sick.

Oh good, so I can cancel my policy.

4 posted on 03/22/2010 2:32:43 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

So the first six months will see a major rise in premiums if the insurance companies must take on all comers including those with preexisting conditions.


5 posted on 03/22/2010 2:32:57 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
So, insurers will face the mandated increases in coverage in six months, but the new customers they expect from mandatory purchasing won't happen until 2014. Yessiree, that industry cut itself a heck of a deal.
6 posted on 03/22/2010 2:34:07 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
It is bazaar but I'll bet their are lots of strings and it isn't what it appears. They will have to be full dependents, living at home unmarried and full time students. Not quite what people will expect.
7 posted on 03/22/2010 2:34:17 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Ya beat me to it......
That's my question too
8 posted on 03/22/2010 2:36:52 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Do you know if it requires for the children to stay on as DEPENDENTS until age 26? Nebraska enacted a law a year or so ago that mandates they be allowed to stay on until age 23 whether or not they are full time students. BUT as soon as they are not eligible as full time students (the first day of the month following graduation or whatever), then they have to pay the FULL adult premium rate, and the employer does not have to contrbibute toward that. So in a real life example I am aware of, the 21 year old college student is to graduate mid-May. The parent’s group insurance drops coverage of her at midnight on May 31st, unless the parent agrees to pay $400/month to keep her on. It really is not a good deal except for someone who is uninsurable.


9 posted on 03/22/2010 2:43:11 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WHBates

My husband’s policy allowed our daughter to be on until the age of 23. Then we kept her on it under COBRA for 2 more years for $500.00 per month since she wasn’t getting any jobs that were offering insurance. The price was close to what she would have had to pay without COBRA but our policy was a little better. Now she’s on a hospital-only policy for a little under $200.00 a month.


10 posted on 03/22/2010 2:46:41 PM PDT by diefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Six months after enactment:
- Would bar insurers from denying people coverage when they get sick.
- Would bar insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions.
- Would bar insurers from imposing lifetime caps on coverage.

- Ergo, sky high premiums.

11 posted on 03/22/2010 2:47:21 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: diefree

Yes, I don’t think it will be the deal people have been told. As usual the devil will be in the details and these people a goofy.


12 posted on 03/22/2010 2:52:52 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF
Do you know if it requires for the children to stay on as DEPENDENTS until age 26?

No idea. Wouldn't surprise me though.

13 posted on 03/22/2010 2:54:14 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
- Would bar insurers from imposing lifetime caps on coverage

Now that will be expensive.

14 posted on 03/22/2010 2:54:27 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

My daughter had to be a dependent up to 23. When she went on COBRA the insurance co. didn’t ask whether she was or not.


15 posted on 03/22/2010 2:56:58 PM PDT by diefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Liberal offspring don’t usually quit breastfeeding until they’re 18 or 19 years old.


16 posted on 03/22/2010 3:03:26 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“90 days after enactment:

- Would provide immediate access to high-risk pools for people with no insurance because of pre-existing conditions.

Six months after enactment:

- Would bar insurers from denying people coverage when they get sick.

- Would bar insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions.

- Would bar insurers from imposing lifetime caps on coverage.

- Would require insurers to allow people to stay on their parents’ policies until they turn 26 “

I don’t think this correct. MSN and CBS BOTH said that after six months, children would not be denied for preexisting conditions and adult in 2014.

So is this guy wrong or is the other reports I’ve read all day?


17 posted on 03/22/2010 3:09:36 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

Don’t know. Have to read the bill.


18 posted on 03/22/2010 3:11:19 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Why would you do that?


19 posted on 03/22/2010 3:18:36 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

To save money. I’ll just purchase the policy on the way to the hospital.


20 posted on 03/22/2010 4:14:01 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson