Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Janet Napolitano halts Mexico fence plan (Surprise! Virtual Border Fence Virtually Worthless)
politico ^ | 3/16/10 | JEN DIMASCIO

Posted on 03/17/2010 10:09:13 AM PDT by Mount Athos

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has put the brakes on SBInet, the $3 billion plan to build a virtual fence along the U.S. border with Mexico.

“Not only do we have an obligation to secure our borders, we have a responsibility to do so in the most cost-effective way possible,” Napolitano said in a statement Tuesday. “The system of sensors and cameras along the Southwest border known as SBInet has been plagued with cost overruns and missed deadlines.”

With that in mind, Napolitano is withholding funding for the program’s first deployment until a review she ordered in January is finished. And she’s taking away $50 million in stimulus funds from the Boeing-managed program. Instead, that funding will be put toward “other tested, commercially available security technology along the Southwest border.”

The project’s halt comes amid rising violence along the U.S. border with Mexico that has Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) urging Americans to heed the recent State Department travel warning to delay visits to the Mexican states of Durango, Coahuila and Chihuahua.

The move also comes about a week after the DHS inspector general found more problems with the project.

Responding, Boeing spokeswoman Jenna McMullin said the company has always recognized the importance of developing the program quickly and affordably for Customs and the Border Patrol.

“We are fully committed to delivering border security technology that successfully assists them in their mission, and we will continue to support the Department of Homeland Security as they examine the future of securing the nation's borders,” she said.

It’s not the first time, though, the virtual fence has been singled out. The program was a problem child during the Bush administration, and its woes have recently resurfaced.

Napolitano had signal changes recently in testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

“I am not satisfied with SBInet,” Napolitano said, adding at the time that the first section would be completed.

“But before we go across that border with this – these big towers, SBInet,” she added, “we are going to reevaluate how those technology dollars are used and whether there are other technologies perhaps that have been developed since SBInet was contracted that would be more mobile, better, easier to maintain and easier to operate.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: border; borderfence; borders; fence; incompetano; lesbian; lesbo; manhater
noticed this on ace of spades blog
1 posted on 03/17/2010 10:09:14 AM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

How the hell can she steel monies that are allocated to the fence?

This was settled 4 years ago ad the fence isn’t complete yet.

The congress passed it, funded it, and thyis hag wants our money for some tard-dem bs.


2 posted on 03/17/2010 10:16:57 AM PDT by devistate one four (If you can't feed it, don't breed it! Kimber CDP II .45 OOHRAH! TET68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devistate one four

This my dears, IS the Government OF the PEOPLE, By the People and For the People...we’ve come a long way Charlie Brown.


3 posted on 03/17/2010 10:20:18 AM PDT by rovenstinez (All)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: devistate one four

She just needs to announce that the borders are wide open. Then arm the citizens.


4 posted on 03/17/2010 10:21:35 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

“Virtual fence” was sleight-of-hand and a boondoggle from the git-go.

How about an old-fashioned non-virtual or REAL FENCE to keep people out? How quickly can we get that project “shovel-ready?”


5 posted on 03/17/2010 10:22:31 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
Janet sweetie, HOW ABOUT A FREAKING FENCE??

Couple this with increased border guards, and maybe, just maybe, some very large dogs. I think this would deter all but the Drug runners, and we can shoot them.

I know they would just dig tunnels, but that costs money.

The seismic industry today uses a machine that shakes the ground violently to take seismic readings of what is under the ground. If this doesn't collapse tunnels, it would at least expose them. If there happens to be some criminal trying to enter this country illegally, so much the better.

6 posted on 03/17/2010 10:26:29 AM PDT by snowtigger (It ain't what you shoot, it's what you hit...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
Perhaps one could simply uplink to unmanned Global Hawks/Predator/ (resurrected) Dark Stars, flying 'lazy eights', equipped with airborne lasers.
Silicon spots in the deserts. ;)


7 posted on 03/17/2010 10:31:23 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen ("Listen up people, let me be perfectly clear..I inherited the unprecedented, the unexpected.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

4 man gun towers with night vision every 500 meters ... cheap and efficient with trained men arriving home in need of translating their MOS into a transitional civvy job.


8 posted on 03/17/2010 10:41:50 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

OK! So Napolitano won’t go forward with the virtual fence. The question is when will she build the actual fence?

Between Bush, the Democrats, and this anti-American administration, this country is probably crammed with terrorists and drug dealers already.

Anything Napolitano says must be considered with suspicion. Especially after that memo she sent to law enforcement last year saying that Iraq War veterans and people with pro-life stickers on their cars should be subject to careful scrutiny by police.

That woman does not have her job by accident. If Barack Obama chose her she is no good.


9 posted on 03/17/2010 10:42:38 AM PDT by SkipW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
Powerful political and economic interests want millions of Mexicans in the country-PERIOD. What happens to the Anglo-American is of no concern to the politicians. That is why no fence was built, is being built or ever will be built.

Add to the above the fact that the American is besotted with pity, tolerance, equality in the areas of social and economics together with a life 'philosophy' of eating, drinking, drugging, copulating, evacuating the bowels and snoring means we are in bad shape. Adding to the problem is the constant barrage of propaganda directed against all areas of Western Civilization.

10 posted on 03/17/2010 10:52:43 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

What in blazes is a virtual fence?
I’ve seen commercials on TV for an invisible fence for your dog. You bury a wire around the perimeter of your yard and if the pooch tries to cross then he gets a shock.
How is Janet going to get all those wetbacks to put on shock collars before they cross over?
The only viable alternative to a fence is watch towers and snipers.


11 posted on 03/17/2010 10:58:59 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (If you're not patriotic, you're nothing !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Minefields are cheap and effective. If we can send the census out in 10 languages, I’m pretty sure we can have minefield warning signs in two.


12 posted on 03/17/2010 11:04:14 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf
What we need to do is change the law to allow actual military on our borders. We need to purchase, using eminent domain, if necessary, a narrow strip, say, 1500 feet along ALL our borders. Establish this zone as a "No-man's land".

Anyone entering from the US side would be stopped, questioned, and deposited on whichever side deemed appropriate. Those entering form outside would be stopped, the first 1,000 feet would be verbal instruction, the last 500 feet would be by any means necessary.

This would keep some of our already trained troops in the military and provide some REAL security.

13 posted on 03/17/2010 11:11:01 AM PDT by snowtigger (It ain't what you shoot, it's what you hit...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Kay Bailey Hutchison must have been whispering in her ear after the governor defeat.


14 posted on 03/17/2010 11:13:10 AM PDT by bgill (The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

The “virtual fence” was an excuse to do nothing,

of course they’re going to drop it as well,
because they want NO fence.


15 posted on 03/17/2010 11:14:47 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knarf

I go with that, and bunkers with MG emplacements and cleared fields of view. Add in a concrete fence topped with barbed wire and you’re set.


16 posted on 03/17/2010 11:16:35 AM PDT by kamikaze2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

“What in blazes is a virtual fence?”\

It was a Bush Boondoggle for Boeing.


17 posted on 03/17/2010 11:20:21 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

March 16, 2010

Note: The following text is a quote:

http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/pr_1268769368466.shtm

“Not only do we have an obligation to secure our borders, we have a responsibility to do so in the most cost effective way possible. The system of sensors and cameras along the Southwest border known as SBInet has been plagued with cost overruns and missed deadlines. Effective immediately, the Department of Homeland Security will redeploy $50 million of Recovery Act funding originally allocated for the SBInet Block 1 to other tested, commercially available security technology along the Southwest border, including mobile surveillance, thermal imaging devices, ultra-light detection, backscatter units, mobile radios, cameras and laptops for pursuit vehicles, and remote video surveillance system enhancements. Additionally, we are freezing all SBInet funding beyond SBInet Block 1’s initial deployment to the Tucson and Ajo regions until the assessment I ordered in January is completed.”


18 posted on 03/20/2010 12:56:38 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson