Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rielle Hunter speaks for the first time in GQ interview about John and Elizabeth Edwards
Washington Post ^ | March 15, 2010 | Reliable Source

Posted on 03/15/2010 2:39:02 AM PDT by tlb

Hunter says she's still in love with "Johnny" and believes he loves her. That they went to bed together the day they met. That his marriage was "toxic," that he feared "the wrath of Elizabeth."

The nearly 10,000-word Q&A is accompanied by photos of Hunter styled as Jennifer Aniston might be for a glossy mag: Glowing skin, blond hair, curled on a bed in a white shirt and strand of pearls, bare-legged with a glimpse of panties.

..she met Edwards in February 2006 outside a New York City hotel, after "a mutual, unusual staring" at each other earlier inside the lounge. She was surprised to learn the stranger she was flirting with was Edwards, who had come across as a "two-dimensional geek" on TV. "You're so hot," she said to him. "Why, thank you," she said he replied. He begged her to call, she says; hours later, they met in his room.

"You know, it was just this, this magnetic force field like I had never experienced."

Hunter recently sued him (Young) for the return of an alleged Edwards-Hunter sex tape the Youngs claim to have found. Judging from "the army of lawyers that represent her in her suit against me," Young said, "it is obvious to me that her attacks on me are orchestrated and paid for by the wealthy and powerful individuals most affected by this."

John hasn't "fallen from grace... he's fallen to grace," and astrology told her he shouldn't run for president anyway. There's a lot of rationalizing -- John lied about her because "he was traumatized." There's some "Men are from Mars, women are from Venus" -- she couldn't go public sooner because she didn't want to "emasculate" her ex-lover.

(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: edwards; gq; mistress; rielle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Were I her adviser I might have suggested for an article trying to defend herself from homewrecker publicity, she not pose in just a man's shirt and panties on the bed. Even for GQ.

Full title "Rielle Hunter speaks for the first time in GQ interview about John and Elizabeth Edwards, Andrew Young, and the big-money donors" didn't fit.

1 posted on 03/15/2010 2:39:03 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tlb

2 posted on 03/15/2010 2:42:17 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (Quo Warranto better than Apocolypto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Wow she’s trash. The left sure buried him quick. For awhile though, they really loved him. Scumbags all.


3 posted on 03/15/2010 2:44:31 AM PDT by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

The nearly 10,000-word Q&A is accompanied by photos of Hunter styled as Jennifer Aniston might be for a glossy mag: Glowing skin, blond hair, curled on a bed in a white shirt and strand of pearls, bare-legged with a glimpse of panties.

Personally, I kind of wish the Hairball would run for President again

4 posted on 03/15/2010 2:52:57 AM PDT by Zakeet (Will Rogers never met the Wee Wee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

She needs to lose the baby fat.

Let’s get things straight here. She does something that many people would find morally reprehensible.

Then, some queer magazine called GQ decides she’s important enough to basically hand her a microphone and give her a forum where she might reach millions of people.

Bloodsucking media will pimp anything they can to get their sales, I guess...


5 posted on 03/15/2010 3:03:25 AM PDT by djf (Who says "The stuff of life" is not stuff? Mostly it's people who have the most stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Taking pictures like that continues to fuel her sleazy reputation. It’s not like she hadn’t already sealed that reputation for herself, though. I feel bad for the little girl and the situation she was born into.


6 posted on 03/15/2010 3:07:27 AM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb; All
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us 

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

 

Photobucket 

7 posted on 03/15/2010 3:08:04 AM PDT by backhoe (All Across America, the Lights are being relit again...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Barney: "I see London! I see France!"

8 posted on 03/15/2010 3:10:04 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Some are worried about the ‘coarsening’ of society and public discourse. (Not, however, the MSM). Thank you, Bill Clinton, for getting it up to warp speed.


9 posted on 03/15/2010 3:11:50 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
John hasn't “fallen from grace... he's fallen to grace,”

Groan! I can see she is as delusional as ever.

and astrology told her he shouldn't run for president anyway.”

Oh boy!

There's a lot of rationalizing — John lied about her because “he was traumatized.”

John Edwards is incapable of getting traumatized. His entire life has been spent traumatizing other people. The guy doesn't even have a heart. Everything about him is fake.

10 posted on 03/15/2010 3:14:03 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

She played the oldest game in the woman’s trick bag. She threw herself at him unprotected,and got knocked up, thinking she would get rich.

It’s been played over and over, and so often it works.

Edwards should have been smart enough to see this one coming. Instead he took an easy piece. Dumb.


11 posted on 03/15/2010 3:29:57 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

A curse on Andy’s Warhol’s fifteen minutes of fame...can we lower it to 15 seconds? Dreck like Edward’s and his mental midget fling don’t warrant more than that...who cares about the adulterous liaisons of morons?


12 posted on 03/15/2010 3:38:14 AM PDT by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Ping for later, just sitting here laughing at what you guys are saying. Keep going!


13 posted on 03/15/2010 3:55:16 AM PDT by FoxPro (I love bacon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

At least we now know what he meant by: There are two Americas. . .”


14 posted on 03/15/2010 3:58:35 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

What a trio Rielle John and Elizabeth
The Slut, The Butt and The Nut.


15 posted on 03/15/2010 4:03:13 AM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

RH is lots of things, but fat really isn’t one of them.


16 posted on 03/15/2010 4:07:06 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tlb
She's rather pale looking.

"The Edwardses bought a home..."

Huh?
17 posted on 03/15/2010 4:12:02 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

I don’t know what Ol’ John Edwards said to this woman, but he must be one silver tongued dude. That is if “dude” and “John Edwards” can be used in the same sentence or paragraph.


18 posted on 03/15/2010 4:14:24 AM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Never said she was fat.
Baby fat is not the same as ordinary obesity.


19 posted on 03/15/2010 4:17:01 AM PDT by djf (Who says "The stuff of life" is not stuff? Mostly it's people who have the most stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: healy61

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think “dude” was originally a term used by western small town/rancher types used to describe well dressed people from the east coast who basically couldn’t do chit on the farm.

Sounds to me like “dude” fits exactly!


20 posted on 03/15/2010 4:25:06 AM PDT by djf (I think "The stuff of life" is not "stuff". But "stuff" ain't bad!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson