Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chief Justice Roberts Not Stepping Down Despite Report
FoxNews | 3/4/10

Posted on 03/04/2010 11:56:48 AM PST by Ol' Sparky

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: CajunConservative

I think RadarOnline.com did this to gain exposure to their site.


61 posted on 03/04/2010 1:14:23 PM PST by phill413
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CajunConservative

The Key there is Altman’s ownership..who was an advisor to Kerry and Hillary...and for those that believe the Bilderberg conspiracy..supposedly he is a member or attended one of their meetings in Greece..according to WIKI..which , of course, is not reliable


62 posted on 03/04/2010 1:14:53 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
Chief Justice John Roberts is not stepping down from the Supreme Court, despite a celebrity gossip report, a source very close to Roberts told Fox News.

RadarOnline.com reported Thursday that Roberts, 55, would be resigning for personal reasons.

But the source said the report is "completely untrue." There is "no medical issue, no issue at all," the source said, adding that there is not even a 1 percent chance that Roberts is considering resignation.

Thank God! Sorry about that false alarm earlier...

63 posted on 03/04/2010 1:17:13 PM PST by nutmeg (Rush Limbaugh & Sarah Palin agree: NO third parties! Take back the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

Thank You!
The stench coming from the report was a clue to Dummies trying to get Conservs upset. Lying scumbags.


64 posted on 03/04/2010 1:17:23 PM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

WHOA.....I was really worried there.

Now i can relax a little.


65 posted on 03/04/2010 1:17:56 PM PST by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Since when does anyone give any credence to celebrity gossip reports. What, did someone ask him “Who” he was wearing?


66 posted on 03/04/2010 1:23:42 PM PST by scottinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
If that had been true, then all would be lost. Would mean no overturn of Roe, would mean the undoing of the right to own a gun etc etc.

Would lead to Churches having to remove crosses from outside of buildings etc.

Thank God it is not true????!!!

I believe all that voted for Obama or did not vote for McCain/Palin have blood on their hands as it is. The last appointment to the Court, could have been a Conservative.

As bad as McCain may be, he would have appointed a Conservative, Sarah would have made sure of it! Yes I know that it might have been impossible to get a Conservative on the court, but at the very least, a 8 member court would have been a victory compared to the woman Barry appointed.

67 posted on 03/04/2010 1:24:00 PM PST by Friendofgeorge ( SARAH PALIN or BUST.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Chief Justice John Roberts is not stepping down from the Supreme Court, despite a celebrity gossip report, a source very close to Roberts told Fox News.

RadarOnline.com reported Thursday that Roberts, 55, would be resigning for personal reasons.

But the source said the report is “completely untrue.” There is “no medical issue, no issue at all,” the source said, adding that there is not even a 1 percent chance that Roberts is considering resignation.

RadarOnline.com later published an update saying that Roberts will be staying on the bench.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/04/source-chief-justice-roberts-denies-resignation-report/


68 posted on 03/04/2010 1:25:42 PM PST by upchuck (nobama... the python prez, squeezing the very life out of everything he touches. h/t madamehusker1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

The real story here is- who planted this story and to what end?


69 posted on 03/04/2010 1:27:46 PM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat veteran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy

I agree. Someone is all wee wee’d up about the last ruling of the SCOTUS.


70 posted on 03/04/2010 1:28:03 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CajunConservative

Now that explains a thing or two.


71 posted on 03/04/2010 1:28:27 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

I could care less about a scandal - ROBERTS STAYS. Their ‘game’ won’t play this time!


72 posted on 03/04/2010 1:29:29 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
... adding that there is not even a 1 percent chance that Roberts is considering resignation.

Uh oh! That means there could be a .9% chance! We're doomed!
73 posted on 03/04/2010 1:29:56 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

I hope not but you never know, sinister forces are always at work. They certainly see the current court as an obstacle to their “progress” toward socialism.


74 posted on 03/04/2010 1:31:20 PM PST by rbosque (11 year Freeper! Combat Economist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

I second your Thank you God! I received the notice in email — glad I didn’t check my email until the facts were out.


75 posted on 03/04/2010 1:31:29 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Rick Perry - TX Gov/Coburn/Rubio - Senate 2010 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rbosque

Take heart in knowing that the folks over at Daily KOS are feeling now the way we felt this morning.


76 posted on 03/04/2010 1:35:19 PM PST by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
The Left is still seething over the recent campaign contributions decision by the Supremes. It's one of the things spurring it on and driving it over the edge.

Planting rumors like this is another Alinsky tactic....regularly create fear, doubt, turmoil, chaos and unease.

The media whores, especially the liberal-controlled celebrity gossip rags and blogs, have nothing to lose by publishing rumors and propaganda, just a few inches of space or a few minutes on the computer to deny, retract or utter an insincere correction or apology.

We are being attacked by perverted leftist filth from just about every corner they can think of. And yes, they DO know exactly what they're doing.

We must be vigilant....we must be diligent......

Leni

77 posted on 03/04/2010 1:36:37 PM PST by MinuteGal (Bill O'Reilly: 9/8/09: "Communism is not a threat to us anymore"-10/20/09: "Obama is not a Marxist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Thanks to Roccus.

This story sort of says it all.
This site is a Dummie owned site failing needed boast. And Fox provided them a forum.

Octo-Mom’s story breaks, RadarOnline is born

CHANNEL ISLAND / SCOTT COLLINS
The N.Y. -based website, backed in part by the National Enquirer folks, has a made a name for itself with blanket coverage of the Whittier woman’s brood.
March 02, 2009|SCOTT COLLINS
(Page 2 of 3)So RadarOnline is a key part of its catch-up strategy. AMI acquired the site after Radar, a magazine meant to offer a sophisticated take on the world of media and celebrity, failed to catch on after several tries.

Would “Today” and other mainstream media outlets be relying so heavily on all those Octo-Mom scoops if they were branded as National Enquirer content rather than RadarOnline? Ponder that question and you begin to see why buying the Radar name proved valuable for AMI. If the point of the purchase was to start with a fresh online slate and avoid the tabloid taint, it’s a diabolical plan that’s succeeded brilliantly.


78 posted on 03/04/2010 1:41:53 PM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

the left’s wildest wet dream is that Roberts will be gone.


79 posted on 03/04/2010 1:50:08 PM PST by DollyCali (Don't tell God how big your storm is...Tell the storm how big your God is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

“RadarOnline.com reported Thursday that Roberts, 55, would be resigning for personal reasons.”

Trial balloon. Burst. Amateur. Prob’ly more to come before November.


80 posted on 03/04/2010 1:52:03 PM PST by corvus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson